首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Security Research >The Partisan Mentality and Regime Change: An Analysis of Partisanship in the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan Wars
【24h】

The Partisan Mentality and Regime Change: An Analysis of Partisanship in the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan Wars

机译:党派的心态和政权变化:朝鲜战争,越南,伊拉克和阿富汗战争中的党派分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents the results of an analysis of partisan attitudes towards war for the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan Wars. In total, 85 surveys conducted by the Gallup Organization starting in August 1950 (near the beginning of the Korean War) and ending May 2011 (recent events from the Afghanistan War) were analyzed. Previous research of public opinion during wartime indicates how powerful the influence of political party affiliation is in the United States on individualsa?? war attitudes, with several scholars suggesting that most people follow the cues provided by their most salient political reference groupa??their own party. Therefore, they are inclined to follow their President's lead no matter the Administration's policy on foreign affairs. There has been evidence to suggest that the earlier wars in modern America, the wars in Korea and Vietnam, that this was in fact true. In the later wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, two wars closely linked to the a??War on Terror,a?? this did not occur. During times of regime change, the shift in power from a Republican Bush regime to a Democratic Obama regime has indicated that citizens are no longer following their party cue and in fact are more likely to reject the policies of their own party leaders. The evidence in this research points out that partisans can no longer be thought of as followers, which may suggest that leaders can no longer rely on their own party base for support on war policies.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSWar, public opinion, polling, terrorismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2012.631109
机译:本文介绍了对朝鲜战争,越南战争,伊拉克战争和阿富汗战争的游击党态度的分析结果。总共分析了盖洛普组织(Gallup Organisation)从1950年8月(朝鲜战争开始前)至2011年5月(阿富汗战争最近的事件)进行的调查。战时以前的舆论研究表明,美国政党联盟对个人的影响有多大?战争态度,一些学者建议大多数人遵循其最显着的政治参考团体提供的暗示-他们自己的政党。因此,无论政府的外交政策如何,他们都倾向于跟随总统的领导。有证据表明,现代美国的早期战争,韩国和越南的战争实际上是正确的。在后来的伊拉克和阿富汗战争中,两次战争与“反恐战争” a这没有发生。在政权更迭期间,从共和党布什政权过渡到民主党奥巴马政权的过程表明,公民不再遵循党的暗示,事实上,他们更有可能拒绝其党魁的政策。这项研究的证据指出,游击党不再被视为追随者,这可能表明领导人不再能够依靠自己的政党基础来支持战争政策。全文阅读战争,民意,民意测验,恐怖主义相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2012.631109

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号