首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Combat-incurred bilateral transfemoral limb loss: A comparison of the Vietnam War to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq
【24h】

Combat-incurred bilateral transfemoral limb loss: A comparison of the Vietnam War to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

机译:战斗引起的双股股骨四肢缺失:越南战争与阿富汗和伊拉克战争的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study is a comparison of the self-reported health status, quality of life, function, and prosthetic use of veterans with bilateral transfemoral limb loss following combat injury in either the Vietnam War or the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, to learn what improvements in surgery, prosthetics, and rehabilitation have occurred. METHODS: Subjects were identified from Veteran's Administration and military databases. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of service members with bilateral transfemoral amputation who participated in a larger survey of service members with any type of amputation associated with a battlefield injury from the Vietnam War or Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF). The survey was conducted by mail, telephone, or Web site during 2007 to 2008. RESULTS: There were 501 subjects in the Vietnam group and 541 in the OIF/OEF group with any type of limb loss. Bilateral transfemoral amputation was reported in 23 (7.7%) of 298 of the Vietnam group and 10 (3.5%) of 283 of the OIF/OEF group (χ test, p = 0.04). Self-reported health status was rated as good to excellent in 40% of the Vietnam group and 80% in the OIF/OEF group (p = 0.04). Quality of life was rated as good to excellent in 54.6% of the Vietnam group and 70% of the OIF/OEF group (not significant). Wheelchair use is reported by 22 of 23 subjects in the Vietnam group and all of the subjects of the OIF/OEF group. Of the Vietnam group, 8 (34.7%) of 23 currently use prostheses versus 7 (70%) of 10 of the OIF/OEF group (χ test, p = 0.13). The mean (SD) number of prostheses currently used is 1.0 (1.9) for the Vietnam group and 4.0 (5.2) for the OIF/OEF group (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Participants who served in OIF/OEF and those who served in Vietnam report comparable quality of life. Prosthetic use continues to be a problem, especially as the service member ages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.
机译:背景:本研究比较了越南战争或最近在阿富汗和伊拉克发生的战斗受伤后,自报的健康状况,生活质量,功能和假肢合并双侧经股骨四肢丧失的假肢使用情况,以学习手术,修复和康复方面有什么改善。方法:从退伍军人管理局和军事数据库中识别受试者。对双侧经股截肢的服务成员进行了横断面调查,他们参加了较大规模的对与越战或伊拉克自由/持久自由行动(OIF / OEF)造成战场伤害的截肢相关的服务成员的调查。该调查是通过邮件,电话或网站于2007年至2008年进行的。结果:越南组中有501名受试者,OIF / OEF组中有541名受试者患有任何类型的肢体丢失。越南组298例中有23例(7.7%)和OIF / OEF组283例中有10例(3.5%)报告了双侧经股骨截肢(χ检验,p = 0.04)。自我报告的健康状况在越南组中占40%,在OIF / OEF组中占80%(p = 0.04)。越南组的54.6%和OIF / OEF组的70%的生活质量被评为良好或优秀(不显着)。越南组和OIF / OEF组的所有受试者中有23名受试者中有22名报告了轮椅使用情况。越南组中,目前使用23种假体中的8种(34.7%),而OIF / OEF组中10种中的7种(70%)使用假体(χ检验,p = 0.13)。越南组目前使用的假体平均数(SD)为1.0(1.9),OIF / OEF组为4.0(5.2)(p = 0.022)。结论:在OIF / OEF和在越南服务的参与者报告了可比的生活质量。假体使用仍然是一个问题,尤其是随着服务成员的年龄增长。证据级别:流行病学研究,三级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号