首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Physics >Electromigration diffusion mechanism of electroplated copper and cold/hot two-step sputter-deposited aluminum-0.5-wt% copper damascene interconnects
【24h】

Electromigration diffusion mechanism of electroplated copper and cold/hot two-step sputter-deposited aluminum-0.5-wt% copper damascene interconnects

机译:电镀铜与冷热两步溅射沉积铝-0.5-wt%铜镶嵌互连的电迁移扩散机理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The electromigration (EM) diffusion mechanisms of electroplated copper (Cu) with tantalum (Ta) barrier/dielectric diffusion barrier SiC_xN_y and cold/hot two-step sputter-deposited aluminum (Al)-0.5-wt %Cu damascene interconnects with niobium (Nb) liner are examined and compared using the via-EM testing pattern with different linewidths. The interface between Cu and SiC_xN_y is the dominant diffusion path for the Cu damascene interconnects regardless of the Cu microstructure. An activation energy (E_a) of approximately 0.9 ± 0.03 eV is obtained for the width range of 0.1-6 μm. Therefore, the diffusion mechanism is independent of the Cu microstructure. Regarding the cold/hot two-step sputter-deposited Al-0.5-wt %Cu damascene interconnects with Nb liner, the EM median time to failure (MTF) increases with increasing the linewidth for the Al bamboolike microstructure, indicating that the interface between the Al and Nb liners is the dominant diffusion path. This is probably because a rapid diffusion path along the NbAl_x reaction product is formed during the two-step cold/hot sputter deposition at 400℃. The EM MTF does not increase for more than 4 μm. It is also found that the E_a is approximately 0.9 eV for the Al bamboolike microstructure and that it decreases with increasing linewidth for the Al polycrystalline microstructure, meaning that the grain-boundary diffusion is also included and that ratio of the interfacial diffusion and grain-boundary diffusion depends upon the linewidth. This is because the E_a of the grain-boundary diffusion is smaller than that of the interfacial diffusion for Al-0.5-wt %Cu damascene interconnects. The EM diffusion mechanism of the Cu damascene interconnects with Ta barrier/dielectric diffusion barrier SiC_xN_y is completely different from that of the Al damascene interconnects with Nb liner.
机译:具有钽(Ta)阻挡层/电介质扩散阻挡层SiC_xN_y和冷/热两步溅射沉积铝(Al)-0.5-wt%Cu镶嵌与铌(Nb)互连的电镀铜(Cu)的电迁移(EM)扩散机理)衬板使用具有不同线宽的via-EM测试图案进行检查和比较。 Cu和SiC_xN_y之间的界面是Cu镶嵌互连的主要扩散路径,而与Cu的微观结构无关。对于0.1-6μm的宽度范围,获得大约0.9±0.03eV的活化能(E_a)。因此,扩散机理与Cu的微观结构无关。关于冷/热两步溅射沉积的Al-0.5-wt%Cu镶嵌金属与Nb衬里的互连,EM中位数失效时间(MTF)随着Al Bamboolike微观结构线宽的增加而增加,表明Al和Nb衬里是主要的扩散路径。这可能是因为在400℃的两步冷/热溅射沉积过程中,沿着NbAl_x反应产物形成了快速扩散路径。 EM MTF的增加不超过4μm。还发现,对于铝竹状微结构,E_a约为0.9 eV,对于铝多晶微结构,其随着线宽的增加而减小,这意味着晶界扩散也包括在内,并且界面扩散与晶界的比率扩散取决于线宽。这是因为,对于Al-0.5-wt%的Cu金属镶嵌互连,晶界扩散的E_a小于界面扩散的E_a。具有Ta势垒/介电扩散势垒SiC_xN_y的Cu镶嵌互连的EM扩散机理与具有Nb衬里的Al镶嵌互连的EM扩散机理完全不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号