首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Logic >One-dimensional vs. two-dimensional based features: Plant identification approach
【24h】

One-dimensional vs. two-dimensional based features: Plant identification approach

机译:基于一维和二维的特征:植物识别方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The number of endangered species has been increased due to shifts in the agricultural production, climate change, and poor urban planning. This has led to investigating new methods to address the problem of plant species identification/classification. In this paper, a plant identification approach using 2D digital leaves images was proposed. The approach used two features extraction methods based on one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) and the Bagging classifier. For the 1D-based methods, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Direct Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA), and PCA + LDA techniques were applied, while 2DPCA and 2DLDA algorithms were used for the 2D-based method. To classify the extracted features in both methods, the Bagging classifier, with the decision tree as a weak learner was used. The five variants, i.e. PCA, PCA + LDA, DLDA, 2DPCA, and 2DLDA, of the approach were tested using the Flavia public dataset which consists of 1907 colored leaves images. The accuracy of these variants was evaluated and the results showed that the 2DPCA and 2DLDA methods were much better than using the PCA, PCA + LDA, and DLDA. Furthermore, it was found that the 2DLDA method was the best one and the increase of the weak learners of the Bagging classifier yielded a better classification accuracy. Also, a comparison with the most related work showed that our approach achieved better accuracy under the same dataset and same experimental setup. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:由于农业生产的变化,气候变化和不良的城市规划,濒危物种的数量有所增加。这导致了研究解决植物物种识别/分类问题的新方法。在本文中,提出了一种使用2D数字叶子图像的植物识别方法。该方法使用了基于一维(1D)和二维(2D)的两种特征提取方法以及Bagging分类器。对于基于1D的方法,应用了主成分分析(PCA),直接线性判别分析(DLDA)和PCA + LDA技术,而基于2D的方法则使用了2DPCA和2DLDA算法。为了用两种方法对提取的特征进行分类,使用了以决策树为弱学习者的Bagging分类器。使用Flavia公共数据集测试了该方法的五个变体,即PCA,PCA + LDA,DLDA,2DPCA和2DLDA,该数据集包含1907个彩色叶子图像。评估了这些变体的准确性,结果表明2DPCA和2DLDA方法比使用PCA,PCA + LDA和DLDA更好。此外,发现2DLDA方法是最好的方法,而Bagging分类器的弱学习者的增加产生了更好的分类精度。另外,与最相关的工作进行比较,我们的方法在相同的数据集和相同的实验设置下也获得了更高的准确性。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号