...
首页> 外文期刊>Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety >Implementation of a Front-End Split-Flow Model to Promote Performance in an Urban Academic Emergency Department
【24h】

Implementation of a Front-End Split-Flow Model to Promote Performance in an Urban Academic Emergency Department

机译:实施前端分流模型以提高城市学术急诊部门的绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In an urban academic emergency department (ED), a front-end split-flow model, which entailed deployment of an attending-physician intake model, implementation of a 16-bed clinic decision unit, expanded point-of-care (POC) testing, and dedicated ED transportation services, was created. Methods: A retrospective, observational, pre-post intervention comparison study was conducted at a large academic urban hospital with 74,000 ED annual visits that serves as a Level 2 Trauma Center. The new flow model was implemented in April 2013, coincident with the opening of a new ED space. Results: During the six-month pre- (July 2012-December 2012) and postimplementation (July 2013-December 2013) periods, there were 17,307 and 27,443, respectively, walk-in encounters during the intake times. Despite this 59% increase and a 35% increase in overall ED patient census, implementation of the innovative novel process redesign resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction (median minutes pre vs. post and one-year post) in (1) overall length of stay (LOS) for all walk-ins (220 vs. 175 and 140), discharged (216 vs. 170 and 140), and inpatient admissions (249 vs. 217 and 181); (2) door-to-physician time (minutes) (54 vs. 15 and 12); and (3) left without being seen (LWBS) rates (5.5% vs. 0.5% and 0.0%). The left before visit complete (LBVC) rates were 0.8% vs. 1.1% and 0.6%. The average total relative value unit (RVU) per patient discharged from intake was 2.31. During the pre-post analysis periods, no significant increase in reported safety events were identified (10 vs. 9 per 1,000 patient encounters). Conclusion: Implementation of a novel multifaceted process redesign including an attending physician-driven intake model had a clinically positive impact on ED flow. Validation of this model should be conducted in other practice settings.
机译:背景:在城市学术急诊科(ED)中,采用前端分流模型,其中包括部署主治医师摄入模型,实施16张床的临床决策单元,扩大医疗点(POC) )测试,并创建了专用的ED运输服务。方法:回顾性,观察性,事后干预前比较研究是在一家大型学术城市医院进行的,该医院每年进行74,000 ED ED访视,作为2级创伤中心。新的流动模型于2013年4月实施,同时开设了新的ED空间。结果:在入学时间的前六个月(2012年7月至2012年12月)和实施后的六个月(2013年7月至2013年12月)期间,分别有17,307和27,443例。尽管ED患者总普查增加了59%,而总普查增加了35%,但实施创新的新颖流程重新设计仍使(1)总住院时间的临床意义上减少了(前中后分钟数与中后数分钟和一年后数) (LOS):所有未预约(220 vs. 175和140),出院(216 vs. 170和140)和住院人数(249 vs. 217和181); (2)上门医生的时间(分钟)(54对15和12); (3)不可见(LWBS)率(5.5%对0.5%和0.0%)。访视前完成(LBVC)率分别为0.8%,1.1%和0.6%。每名从摄入量出院的患者的平均总相对价值单位(RVU)为2.31。在事后分析期间,未发现报告的安全事件显着增加(每千名患者中10人比9人)。结论:实施新颖的多方面流程重新设计(包括主治医师驱动的摄入模型)对ED流量具有临床积极影响。该模型的验证应在其他实践环境中进行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety》 |2016年第6期|271-280|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado;

    University of Colorado School of Nursing;

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;

    Emergency and Trauma Services, University of Colorado Hospital;

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;

    Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号