首页> 外文期刊>Irish Studies Review >Settler nationalism: Ulster unionism and postcolonial theory
【24h】

Settler nationalism: Ulster unionism and postcolonial theory

机译:定居者民族主义:阿尔斯特工会主义与后殖民理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the capacity of postcolonial theory to accommodate a wide variety of situations, one area of postcolonial experience still has not received much attention - the experience of non-hegemonic settler colonies, that is settler colonies that did not in the end succeed in dominating native populations politically or culturally. Analysis of the unionist community in Northern Ireland offers a number of refinements to postcolonial theory at the same time that it demonstrates how postcolonial theory can enrich our understanding of non-hegemonic settler populations. While every postcolonial culture, native or settler, is uniquely structured by specific historical circumstances, there are features that many of these cultures share, such as hybridity, estrangement, incommensurability, contradiction, mimicry, miscognition, ambivalence, resistance, and the construction of mythical/historical narratives. The structure of these features, however, differs between native and settler cultures, and it differs in a way that makes one culture the mirror image of the other. This should not be surprising since the same colonial situation produces both native nationalism and settler nationalism, and they are both subject to similar colonial contradictions. Recognising settler nationalism as a legitimate part of postcolonial studies opens up the possibility of exploiting the in-betweenness of settler cultures. Emphasising this in-betweenness, and thus its affinities with native nationalism, suggests that settlers, particularly non-hegemonic settlers, are likely to find more in common with the natives they see themselves in opposition to rather than with the colonisers they identify with.View full textDownload full textKeywordsIrish literature and culture, Northern Ireland, postcolonial theory, settler nationalismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670882.2012.739357
机译:尽管后殖民理论具有适应各种情况的能力,但后殖民经验的一个领域仍未引起太多关注-非霸权移民殖民地的经验,即最终未能成功统治本地人口的移民殖民地政治上或文化上。对北爱尔兰的工会主义者社区的分析为后殖民理论提供了许多改进,同时也证明了后殖民理论如何丰富我们对非霸权移民的理解。尽管每种后殖民文化,无论是本土的还是定居的,都根据特定的历史情况来独特地构造,但是这些文化中的许多具有某些共同特征,例如杂交,疏远,不可通约性,矛盾,模仿,误解,矛盾,抵触和神话般的建构。 /历史叙事。但是,这些特征的结构在本地文化和移民文化之间是不同的,并且在使一种文化成为另一种文化的镜像的方式上也有所不同。这并不奇怪,因为相同的殖民局势既产生了本土民族主义,又产生了定居者民族主义,而且它们都遭受着类似的殖民矛盾。承认定居者民族主义是后殖民研究的合法组成部分,这为利用定居者文化之间的中间性提供了可能性。强调这种中间性以及因此与土著民族主义的联系,表明定居者,特别是非霸权定居者,可能会发现与他们反对的本地人有更多的共同点,而不是与认同的殖民者有更多的共同点。全文下载关键词关键字爱尔兰文学和文化,北爱尔兰,后殖民理论,移民民族主义google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670882.2012.739357

著录项

  • 来源
    《Irish Studies Review》 |2012年第4期|p.463-485|共23页
  • 作者

    F. C. McGratha*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:50:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号