首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Law Computers & Technology >Digital Economy Act 2010: fighting a losing battle? Why the 'three strikes' law is not the answer to copyright law's latest challenge
【24h】

Digital Economy Act 2010: fighting a losing battle? Why the 'three strikes' law is not the answer to copyright law's latest challenge

机译:《 2010年数字经济法》:与失败的斗争作斗争?为什么“三击”法不能解决版权法的最新挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper argues that the Digital Economy Act (DEA) 2010, already much delayed in its implementation, is fundamentally flawed in three respects. First, there are internal inconsistencies in the complex provisions to be enacted under secondary legislation. In particular, the problem of relying on Internet Protocol (IP) addresses to identify alleged infringers has proved problematic. Secondly, the proposed measures are disproportionate in terms of the offence and severity of the punishment involving a warning-system leading to possible disconnection from the Internet for copyright infringement. Thirdly, the Act is unlikely to succeed in its central purpose to control unauthorised digital copying because of its technological specificity in a fast moving environment, and a lack of consumer acceptance. Finally, by comparing the treatment of these issues under legislation in other countries, in particular New Zealand, alternative copyright enforcement models are explored.
机译:本文认为,《 2010年数字经济法》(DEA)的实施已经大为拖延,但在三个方面都存在根本缺陷。首先,根据二级立法要制定的复杂规定存在内部矛盾。特别是,依靠互联网协议(IP)地址识别涉嫌侵权者的问题已被证明是有问题的。其次,在涉及警告系统的犯罪和严厉程度方面,拟议采取的措施是不相称的,因为警告系统可能导致因侵犯版权而从互联网断开连接。第三,该法案不太可能在控制未经授权的数字复制的中心目的上取得成功,因为该法案在快速发展的环境中具有技术特殊性,并且缺乏消费者的认可。最后,通过比较其他国家(尤其是新西兰)的立法对这些问题的处理,探索了替代性的版权执行模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号