首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation >Self-Reporting and Test Discrepancy: Evidence from a National Literacy Survey in Bangladesh
【24h】

Self-Reporting and Test Discrepancy: Evidence from a National Literacy Survey in Bangladesh

机译:自我报告和测验差异:来自孟加拉国全国扫盲调查的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper aims to explore the discrepancy between self-reported and test-based literacy estimates in Bangladesh. It uses the Education Watch national literacy survey data of 2002, during which the literacy status of a nationally representative sample was identified using the two methods referred to above. The findings revealed that the literacy rate generated through a literacy test was significantly lower than that found when the self-report method was used. The level of discrepancy varied from one population group to another, indicating that literacy assessment using the self-report method cannot be equally appropriate for all population groups. Those with a few years of schooling were at a particular risk of over-estimating their status. The paper makes a case for a written literacy assessment rather than an oral evaluation.
机译:本文旨在探讨孟加拉国自我报告和基于测验的识字率估计之间的差异。它使用2002年《教育观察》全国扫盲调查数据,在此期间,使用上述两种方法确定了具有全国代表性的样本的扫盲状况。调查结果表明,通过读写测试产生的识字率明显低于使用自我报告方法时的识字率。不同人群之间的差异程度各异,这表明使用自我报告方法进行的识字评估并不能同样适用于所有人群。受过几年教育的人特别有可能高估自己的地位。本文提出了书面读写能力评估而不是口头评估的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号