首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Economics and Finance >The dynamics of market structure and firm-level adjustment to India's pro-market economic liberalizing reforms, 1988-2006: A Time Varying Panel Smooth Transition Regression (TV-PSTR) approach
【24h】

The dynamics of market structure and firm-level adjustment to India's pro-market economic liberalizing reforms, 1988-2006: A Time Varying Panel Smooth Transition Regression (TV-PSTR) approach

机译:1988-2006年市场结构的动态和企业对印度的市场经济自由化改革的调整:时变面板平滑过渡回归(TV-PSTR)方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper for the first time employs the Time Varying Panel Smooth Transition Regression (TV-PSTR) approach to model the dynamic adjustments of firms and the evolution of industrial structure in the bigger setting of decades against the backdrop of India's dramatic liberalizing reform starting from 1991. Using Indian manufacturing firm data, it finds that the transition of market structure and productivity after liberalization did follow a smooth transition process. Instead of the previously assumed instantaneous 'big-bang' shift just after reforms, it actually took years for the Indian manufacturing industries start to react to the reforms, and the transitional impact of reforms took approximately four to eight years to complete. There is strong evidence of increased competition after the transition, with shrinked returns to scale (RTS) in most industries except for leather and chemical industries. The results on total factor productivity (TFP) are mixed: most import-competing industries, which suffer most from the shrinking of market size experienced no change or decreasing TFP growth; whereas the export-oriented industry, as the industry which benefits most from economy of scale, enjoyed a huge TFP growth following the reforms.
机译:本文首次采用时变面板平滑过渡回归(TV-PSTR)方法来模拟在1991年开始的印度急剧自由化改革的背景下,企业动态调整和产业结构在更大的几十年中的演变。 。使用印度制造业公司的数据,发现自由化后的市场结构和生产率过渡确实遵循了平稳的过渡过程。实际上,印度制造业并不需要花费数年的时间来开始对改革做出反应,而改革所产生的过渡影响大约需要四到八年的时间,而不是像改革后那样立即假定的“大爆炸”转变。强有力的证据表明,过渡后竞争加剧,除皮革和化学工业外,大多数行业的规模收益率(RTS)均下降。全要素生产率(TFP)的结果好坏参半:大多数受市场规模缩小影响最大的进口竞争行业没有变化或TFP增长下降;改革之后,作为出口最大的产业,即从规模经济中受益最大的产业,其全要素生产率增长迅速。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号