首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels
【24h】

Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels

机译:颈椎管狭窄:下颈椎狭窄与多节段水平之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The lower cervical segments are commonly the level responsible for cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, we rarely encounter stenosis at the upper cervical segment in a clinical setting. We assumed that there might be some differences between the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the development of cervical canal stenosis at different segments. We performed positional MRI in the weight-bearing position for 295 consecutive symptomatic patients. All subjects were classified into four groups (A: normal; B: C3-4 stenosis; C: C5-6 stenosis; D: two-level cervical segments stenosis, stenosis at C3-4 and C5-6). Age, sagittal cervical canal diameter, cervical intervertebral disc degeneration, cervical cord compression, and cervical mobilities were evaluated for each group. Group B showed a narrow cervical spinal canal structure at the C3 to C4 pedicle levels, while groups C and D showed narrow structures at the C4 to C6 pedicle levels in the cervical spine. Additionally, the sagittal cervical canal diameters at all pedicle levels, except C7, in group D were significantly smaller than those observed in group C. We demonstrated the differences in the pathogenetic processes for the development of cervical spinal canal stenosis between C3-4, C5-6, and two-level cervical segments stenosis. Our results suggest that the developmental morphological structure of the cervical spinal canal plays an important role in the development of cervical canal stenosis at different segments. Moreover, individuals with sagittal cervical canal diameters of less than 13 mm may be exposed to an increased risk for future development of cervical spinal canal stenosis at the upper cervical segments following stenosis at the lower cervical segments.
机译:下颈段通常是引起颈椎病的水平。但是,在临床情况下,我们很少会在上颈段遇到狭窄。我们假设宫颈管狭窄在不同部位发展的致病机制之间可能存在一些差异。我们对295位连续有症状的患者在负重位置进行了位置MRI。将所有受试者分为四组(A:正常; B:C3-4狭窄; C:C5-6狭窄; D:两级颈段狭窄,C3-4和C5-6狭窄)。对每组的年龄,矢状颈椎管直径,颈椎椎间盘退变,颈椎受压和颈椎活动度进行评估。 B组在椎弓根C3至C4处显示狭窄的颈椎管结构,而C和D组在颈椎C4至C6蒂处显示狭窄的颈椎结构。此外,D组除C7以外的所有椎弓根水平矢状颈管直径均显着小于C组。我们证明了C3-4,C5在颈椎管狭窄发展过程中的差异-6,和两级颈段狭窄。我们的结果表明,颈椎管的发育形态结构在不同部位的颈管狭窄发展中起着重要作用。此外,矢状颈椎管直径小于13毫米的个体可能在下颈椎管狭窄后继而面临上颈椎管颈椎管狭窄将来发展的风险增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号