【24h】

Letters to the Editors

机译:致编辑的信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am very pleased to see the selection of my 2008 paper 'Learning relations and networks in web-based communities' in the 10-year anniversary edition of IJWBC (Haythornthwaite, 2008). In revisiting that paper I find much that has remained the same and resonates with contemporary issues about successful organising of online communities. In particular, the network perspective holds up well, and indeed has become very widely spread as we are constantly presented with network diagrams of connections among members of distributed groups, clustering of linkages between websites, twitter conversational networks, and the common interpretation of 'social networking'. These analyses often claim to have identified 'communities'. They may have, but as I have held since the beginning of my work, community is a hypothesis to be tested (Haythornthwaite et al., 2000). However, as we continue to work, learn and socialise online, it is also valid to reconsider what we mean by 'community' (Haythornthwaite, 2007). We have certainly done that as we have rather rapidly adopted the validity of 'virtual communities', and now even spend time comparing them to 'geo-communities' in terms of social network relations and ties, longevity and persistence, and social capital outcomes. What has changed is that the instances of purely online community are becoming increasingly difficult to find. Both online and offline worlds are intersecting with the rise of the net generation (Rainie, 2012), increasing mobile connectivity, technologies that connect the local and the virtual (e.g., QR codes, GPS, Foursquare). Promoting community is now more likely to entail managing the interaction between online and offline that perfecting on or offline connection (Haythornthwaite and Kendall, 2010).
机译:我很高兴看到IJWBC成立十周年纪念版(Haythornthwaite,2008年)选择了我的2008年论文“学习基于网络的社区中的关系和网络”。在重新审视该论文时,我发现许多内容保持不变,并与成功组织在线社区的当代问题产生了共鸣。尤其是,网络观点一直很好,并且随着我们不断地看到分布式组成员之间的连接网络图,网站之间的链接簇,twitter对话网络以及对“社交”的常见解释,网络的观点确实得到了广泛传播。联网'。这些分析通常声称已识别出“社区”。他们也许有,但是正如我从工作开始以来就一直认为的那样,社区是一个需要检验的假设(Haythornthwaite等,2000)。但是,随着我们继续在网上工作,学习和社交,重新考虑“社区”的含义也很有效(Haythornthwaite,2007)。我们确实做到了这一点,因为我们已经相当快地采用了“虚拟社区”的有效性,并且现在甚至花时间在社交网络关系和纽带,寿命和持久性以及社会资本成果方面将它们与“地理社区”进行比较。发生的变化是,纯在线社区的实例越来越难找到。在线和离线世界都与网络一代的兴起相交(Rainie,2012),增强的移动连接性,连接本地和虚拟的技术(例如QR码,GPS,Foursquare)。促进社区现在更可能需要管理在线和离线之间的交互,以完善在线或离线连接(Haythornthwaite和Kendall,2010年)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Caroline Haythornthwaite;

  • 作者单位

    School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, The iSchool at UBC, University of British Columbia, Irving K. Barber Learning Centre, Suite 470-1961 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号