首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Transitional Justice >Purity and Planning: Shared Logics of Transitional Justice and Development
【24h】

Purity and Planning: Shared Logics of Transitional Justice and Development

机译:纯度与计划:过渡时期司法与发展的共同逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

‘Transitional justice’ and ‘development’ largely have unfolded in the contemporary world as parallel sociopolitical projects, with little apparent intersection or cross-fertilization. The discourses and practices that frame these two projects appear to be quite different – in their scale, their tactics and strategies and their value systems. Yet, it would be surprising if this clean division of labour in the efforts to remake (certain parts of) the world were not underpinned by a deeper, shared political logic and vision. Drawing on discussions at a recent workshop on transitional justice and development, as well as on ethnographic case studies in reparations and memorials in the South African context, this article examines the tensions and commonalities between the twin projects of transitional justice and development. It argues that achieving the respective goals of justice and development depends on an understanding – and critique – of the underlying social, cultural and political processes that connect and determine the outcomes of both these projects.
机译:“过渡司法”和“发展”作为平行的社会政治项目在当代世界中已得到很大的发展,几乎没有明显的交叉或交叉施肥。构成这两个项目的论述和实践似乎有很大不同-在规模,策略和战略以及价值体系方面。然而,如果在重塑世界(某些地区)的努力中这种清晰的分工没有得到更深层,共同的政治逻辑和愿景的支持,这将是令人惊讶的。本文基于最近一次有关过渡时期司法与发展的研讨会的讨论以及南非背景下的赔偿和诉状中的人种学案例研究,本文探讨了过渡时期司法与发展这两个项目之间的紧张关系和共同点。它认为,实现正义与发展各自的目标取决于对基础社会,文化和政治过程的理解和批评,这些过程将连接并确定这两个项目的成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号