首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology and Design Education >Teaching the nature of technology: determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology
【24h】

Teaching the nature of technology: determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology

机译:教授技术的本质:确定和支持学生学习技术哲学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper reports on findings related to the Nature of Technology from Stage Two of the Technological Knowledge and Nature of Technology: Implications for teaching and learning (TKNoT: Imps) research project undertaken in 2009. A key focus in Stage Two was the trialing of different teaching strategies to determine how learning related to the components Characteristics of Technology (CoT) and Characteristics of Technological Outcomes (COTO) could be supported. These components fall within the Nature of Technology (NoT) strand of technology in the New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) (Ministry of Education, 2007) and as such, reflect a philosophical understanding of technology as a discipline. During this stage of the research further exploration was undertaken to determine how student understanding of these two components of technology education progressed from level 1 to level 8 of the NZC (Ministry of Education, 2007). Common misconceptions and partial understandings related to these components are identified and explained and four case studies are presented to illustrate strategies employed by teachers and their impact on student learning related to these two components. The Stage Two outcomes resulted in the revision of the Indicators of Progression for CoT and CoTO in order to clarify the progression expected of students in each component and provide increased teacher guidance to support such progression.
机译:本文报告了在2009年进行的技术知识和技术性质:对教学的启示第二阶段(TKNoT:Imps)研究项目中与技术性质有关的发现。第二阶段的重点是对不同技术的试用。确定如何支持与技术特征(CoT)和技术成果特征(COTO)组成部分相关的教学策略。这些组成部分属于新西兰课程(NZC)中的技术本质(NoT)技术范畴(教育部,2007年),因此反映了对技术作为一门学科的哲学理解。在研究的这一阶段,我们进行了进一步的探索,以确定学生对技术教育这两个组成部分的理解是如何从NZC的1级发展到8级的(教育部,2007年)。识别并解释了与这些组件有关的常见误解和部分理解,并提出了四个案例研究,以说明教师采用的策略及其对这两个组件相关的学生学习的影响。第二阶段的结果导致修订了CoT和CoTO的进度指标,以阐明各部分学生的预期进度,并提供更多的教师指导以支持这种进度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号