首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Social Research Methodology >Methodological approaches at PhD and skills sought for research posts in academia: a mismatch?
【24h】

Methodological approaches at PhD and skills sought for research posts in academia: a mismatch?

机译:博士学位的方法论方法和学术界寻求研究职位的技能:不匹配?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a concern in the UK about a lack of research methods skills among social researchers, especially in relation to quantitative methods. This article draws on findings of a study exploring the training needs of social scientists across the lifespan in the UK and focuses on the research training needs identified by PhD students and the research skills sought by academic employers. The data reported comprises a survey of PhD students, a survey of directors of research centres/holders of large grants and a content analysis of social science research posts. The findings indicate that students in several social science disciplines have a preference for qualitative methods in their PhDs while academic employers and job vacancies for academic posts indicate a need for researchers with skills in quantitative methods. The findings have important implications for training and supervision of research students and identify a need to narrow the gap between early-career researchers' skills and employers' needs.
机译:英国担心社会研究人员缺乏研究方法技能,尤其是在定量方法方面。本文借鉴了一项研究的发现,该研究探讨了英国整个生命周期中社会科学家的培训需求,并着重于博士生确定的研究培训需求和学术雇主寻求的研究技能。报告的数据包括对博士研究生的调查,对研究中心主任/大笔资金持有人的调查以及对社会科学研究职位的内容分析。研究结果表明,一些社会科学学科的学生倾向于在其博士学位中使用定性方法,而学术用人单位和学术职位的职位空缺表明需要具有定量方法技能的研究人员。这些发现对培训和监督研究型学生具有重要意义,并确定了缩小早期研究人员技能与雇主需求之间差距的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号