...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of social ecology and sustainable development >Freedom, Equality and the Quality of Democracy: Democratic Life in the United States, Australia, Sweden and Germany
【24h】

Freedom, Equality and the Quality of Democracy: Democratic Life in the United States, Australia, Sweden and Germany

机译:自由,平等与民主品质:美国,澳大利亚,瑞典和德国的民主生活

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Freedom and equality are the content, the substance and the tension in a liberal democracy of today. Freedom and equality describe the design, stability and the quality of a democracy. Especially in a Quintuple Helix Model, the quality of democracy and sustainable development are closely related, because a high-quality democracy is a prerequisite for promoting sustainability in democracies. By investigating the quality of democracy this article develops two theses: 1.) Democracy with their quality rises or falls with the expression of freedom and/or equality; 2.) Democracy generates its stability from a balanced interaction between freedom and equality. With the concept of Democratic Life this article examines these two theses: Democratic Life as newly developed concept measures the quality of democracy with providing information about the type of a democracy and an approach to measure a democracy's democratic development for the top 20 of the Democracy Ranking (2009). The central keys of the Democratic Life concept are the 'Index of Classification' and the 'Democratic-Life-Index', which are formed from an 'Index of Freedom'and an 'Index of Equality'. By empirical examination of the research question of Democratic Life two essential questions in the modern democratic theory can be investigated: I.) How democratic is a democracy? 2.) How much freedom and equality does a liberal democracy need? The countries analyzed for the Democratic Life concept in this article are the United States, Australia, Sweden and Germany in comparison between 1995 and 2008. This degree of democratic quality will create a lot of problems towards developing sustainability in a democracy, because in the United States there is currently a big disparity between freedom and equality.
机译:自由和平等是当今自由民主制的内容,实质和紧张关系。自由与平等描述了民主的设计,稳定和质量。尤其是在五重螺旋模型中,民主的质量与可持续发展密切相关,因为高质量的民主是促进民主国家可持续性的前提。通过研究民主的素质,本文得出两个结论:1.)民主的质量随着自由和/或平等的表达而上升或下降。 2.)民主通过自由与平等之间的平衡互动来产生其稳定。本文使用“民主生活”的概念研究了以下两个方面:“民主生活”作为一种新近发展的概念,通过提供有关民主类型的信息和衡量民主排名前20位的民主发展的方法来衡量民主的质量(2009)。民主生活概念的关键是“分类指数”和“民主生活指数”,这是由“自由指数”和“平等指数”形成的。通过对民主生活研究问题的实证研究,可以研究现代民主理论中的两个基本问题:I.)民主如何民主? 2.)自由民主需要多少自由与平等?与1995年至2008年相比,本文针对“民主生活”概念进行分析的国家是美国,澳大利亚,瑞典和德国。这种程度的民主素质将为发展民主的可持续性带来很多问题,因为在美国各国目前在自由与平等之间存在很大差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号