...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of selection and assessment >Analysis of the Reliability of the Leadership Practices Inventory in the Item Response Theory Framework
【24h】

Analysis of the Reliability of the Leadership Practices Inventory in the Item Response Theory Framework

机译:项目反应理论框架下领导力实践库存的可靠性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper examines the psychometric properties of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) in the framework of item response theory (IRT). The LPI assesses five dimensions (i.e. leadership practices) of transformational leadership and consists of 30 items. IRT is a model-based theory that relates the characteristics of questionnaire items (item parameters) and characteristics of individuals (latent variables) to the probability of choosing each of the response categories. The theory does not assume that the instrument is equally reliable for all levels of the latent variable examined. Samejima's graded response model was used to estimate LPI item characteristics, such as item difficulty and item discrimination power. The results show that some items are redundant in the sense they contribute little to the overall precision of the instrument. Moreover, the LPI seems to be most precise and reliable for respondents with low to medium leadership competence, whereas it becomes increasingly unreliable for high-quality leaders. These findings suggest that the LPI is best used for training and development purposes, but not for leader selection purposes.
机译:本文在项目反应理论(IRT)的框架下研究了领导力实践清单(LPI)的心理测量特性。 LPI评估了变革型领导力的五个维度(即领导力实践),包括30个项目。 IRT是一种基于模型的理论,将问卷项目的特征(项目参数)和个人特征(潜在变量)与选择每个响应类别的可能性相关联。该理论并不假定该仪器对于所检查的所有潜变量水平均具有相同的可靠性。使用Samejima的分级响应模型来估计LPI项目特征,例如项目难度和项目区分能力。结果表明,某些项目在某种意义上是多余的,它们对仪器的整体精度几乎没有影响。此外,对于具有低至中等领导能力的受访者而言,LPI似乎是最精确和可靠的,而对于高素质的领导者而言,LPI变得越来越不可靠。这些发现表明,LPI最适合用于培训和发展目的,而不是用于领导者甄选目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号