...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of quality and service sciences >Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations
【24h】

Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations

机译:从服务管理到以服务为主导的逻辑的转变:观察和建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to reflect on actions and obstacles in the conceptual transition from mainstream service management (1970-2000s) to a new approach synthesized in service-dominant (SD) logic (2000s).rnDesign/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a review of approaches to service in the literature, education, and practice in management disciplines and economics. Findings - S-D logic has triggered considerable interest in the global academic community. Its ten foundational premises (FPs) hold that service(s) and the roles of suppliers/customers be reconceptualized on a higher level of relevance and generalization. The new logic is not final but -to use its own terminology - is a value proposition that opens up for co-created theory improvements. Research limitations/implications - To transition from a goods/services divide to a goods/service union, the platform for future service research requires the superordination of mainstream service management by a new language and lexicon and the generation of new theory; testing of the new theory by comparing its robustness with that of extant theory; conduct of empirical studies through hypotheses-testing and real world, in-depth research and the application of complexity theory, network, and systems theory; co-creation by and between researchers; focus on validity and relevance by using the full range of S-D logic compatible methods and metrics; and investigation at both micro and macro levels.rnPractical implications - Business, marketing, governments, and politicians should focus on service and value and abandon the goods/services and producer/customer divides. Textbooks and educators should transition from outdated concepts and models. Improved education is strongly supported by IBM's service science programme.rnOriginality/value - The paper suggests that several developments in mainstream service management that once brought attention to service now provide obstacles both in research, education, and practice.
机译:目的-本文的目的是反思从主流服务管理(1970-2000s)到以服务为主(SD)逻辑(2000s)综合的新方法的概念转变中的行动和障碍。rn设计/方法/方法-本文采用对管理学科和经济学中的文献,教育和实践服务方法的回顾形式。发现-S-D逻辑引起了全球学术界的极大兴趣。它的十个基础前提(FP)认为,服务和供应商/客户的角色应在更高的相关性和概括性上重新概念化。新的逻辑不是最终的,而是-使用其自己的术语-是一个价值主张,可为共同创造的理论改进打下基础。研究的局限性/含意-为了从商品/服务划分过渡到商品/服务联合,未来服务研究的平台要求主流服务管理采用新的语言和词典,并产生新的理论;通过比较新理论与现有理论的健壮性来测试新理论;通过假设检验和真实世界进行实证研究,对复杂性理论,网络和系统理论进行深入研究和应用;研究人员和研究人员之间的共同创造;通过使用所有与S-D逻辑兼容的方法和度量,专注于有效性和相关性;实际意义-商业,市场营销,政府和政治人物应将重点放在服务和价值上,并放弃商品/服务与生产者/客户之间的鸿沟。教科书和教育工作者应从过时的概念和模型过渡。改进的教育得到IBM服务科学计划的有力支持。原创性/价值-本文提出,曾经引起人们对服务关注的主流服务管理方面的一些发展现在在研究,教育和实践方面都构成了障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号