首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health Well-Being >Visualism and technification*the patient behind the screen
【24h】

Visualism and technification*the patient behind the screen

机译:视觉化与技术化*屏幕背后的病人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

At stake in this study is the patient’s credibility. The Cartesian philosophical standpoint, which holds sway in westernnthinking, questions with scepticism whether the reported symptoms are ‘‘real.’’ Do they reside in the body, or are theynmentally concocted. However, from the caring perspective any symptom must be both listened and attended to in its ownnright, not just scrutinized as evidence for an accurate diagnosis.nIn cognitively and emotionally complex high-tech units caregivers are juggling a precarious handful of cards. Technicalntasks take precedence or have more urgency than caring behaviour. Assuming an irremediable tension between objectu0002nsubject and careu0002cure in nursing is futile dualism. By addressing the essence of technology*the non-neutral and highlynvisual technology*this paper aims to find, from a philosophical point of view, a more comprehensive understanding for thendominance visualism and technification within intensive care.nScreens give us access to vital signs. Screens record numbers and lines that relate to a graph and afford superfine spikedn‘‘readings.’’ However, the most relevant vital signs may be missing.
机译:该研究的关键在于患者的信誉。笛卡尔的哲学立场在西方思维中占主导地位,对所报告的症状是“真实的”表示怀疑,并质疑它们是存在于体内还是被炮制。但是,从关怀的角度出发,任何症状都必须以其本身的方式来聆听和关注,而不仅仅是作为准确诊断的依据进行审查。在认知和情感复杂的高科技单位中,护理人员正在处理几张不稳定的卡片。技术任务比关怀行为优先或紧迫。假设在护理中对象和护理之间不可克服的张力是徒劳的二元论。通过探讨技术的本质*非中性和高度视觉化的技术*,本文旨在从哲学的角度寻找对重症监护中优势视觉和技术的更全面的理解。n筛查使我们能够获得生命体征。屏幕上会记录与图表相关的数字和线条,并提供超精细的“读数”。但是,最相关的生命体征可能会丢失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号