首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >The distinctiveness of the Welsh partnership agenda
【24h】

The distinctiveness of the Welsh partnership agenda

机译:威尔士伙伴关系议程的独特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to consider whether there is significant divergence between the Welsh and English approaches to partnership working. Design/methodology/approach - The analysis reported stems from a research project, commissioned by the Welsh Assembly Government in 2002, which examined the extent and effectiveness of three-sector partnerships. The findings from the Welsh study are contrasted with the findings of a number of studies of the modernisation agenda in English local government. Findings - First there are increasing numbers of partnership programmes which are born and bred in Wales. Second, Wales has unitary local government and so it does not have the complexity of two-tier structures which frustrate partnership working in the English shires. Third the Welsh polity is a small one with short and close vertical linkages between national and local actors. Fourth, the engagement with the private and voluntary sectors as political stakeholders is a higher political priority in Wales than the involvement of these sectors in service delivery. These differences mean that partnership has a rather different emphasis in Wales. Research limitations/implications - Although focused on Wales, the article raises greater questions about the purposes of partnership working. More work is needed, however, on the measurement of partnership performance. Practical implications - The paper raises questions both about the rationale of partnership governance and about the institutional factors likely to influence success. Originality/value - The paper contributes to the new research area of comparative patterns of UK governance.
机译:目的-本文旨在考虑威尔士语和英语在伙伴关系工作方法之间是否存在重大分歧。设计/方法/方法-所报告的分析源自威尔士议会政府于2002年委托进行的一项研究项目,该项目研究了三部门伙伴关系的程度和有效性。威尔士研究的结果与英国地方政府对现代化议程的许多研究结果进行了对比。发现-首先,在威尔士出生和育成的伙伴关系计划越来越多。其次,威尔士拥有统一的地方政府,因此它没有两级结构的复杂性,而这种结构阻碍了在英国郡中开展合作的工作。第三,威尔士政体是一个很小的政体,在国家和地方行为体之间有着短而紧密的垂直联系。第四,在威尔士,与私营部门和志愿部门作为政治利益相关者的交往比这些部门参与服务提供更为重要。这些差异意味着在威尔士,伙伴关系的侧重点有所不同。研究的局限性/意义-尽管文章的重点是威尔士,但对合作伙伴关系的目的提出了更大的疑问。但是,在衡量合作伙伴绩效方面还需要做更多的工作。实际意义-本文提出了有关伙伴关系治理的基本原理以及可能影响成功的体制因素的问题。原创性/价值-本文为英国治理比较模式的新研究领域做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号