首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management >Supplier perceptions of distributive justice in sustainable apparel sourcing
【24h】

Supplier perceptions of distributive justice in sustainable apparel sourcing

机译:供应商对可持续服装采购中分配正义的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: first, it attempts to determine whether suppliers perceive distributive justice (equity) when their key customers implement sustainable sourcing initiatives based on assessment governance, composed of codes of conduct and auditing; second, it generates insights into specific costs, rewards, and investments and how these together result in perceived equity. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative research design was adopted for this study. A total of 30 executives from textile manufacturing suppliers in China, India, and Bangladesh were interviewed to determine their perceptions of distributive justice in relation to their key customers' sustainable sourcing initiatives. Findings - Most of the interviewees perceived that their customers' assessment of governance initiatives was unfair. Four types of suppliers are identified based on their varying perceptions of the equity equation. Research limitations/implications - The findings introduce distributive justice as an important mediating variable between assessment-based governance and compliance. They also provide insights into the various types of perceived costs, rewards, and investments related to sustainable sourcing, and how they form varieties of the equity equation. The findings rely on a limited number of respondents and should, therefore, be researched further. Practical implications - Assessment based on codes of conduct and auditing is the most prevalent sustainable sourcing governance approach, but suppliers may perceive this as an injustice leading to non-compliance. Buying companies are therefore advised to consider supplier perceptions of costs, rewards, and investments and adapt their sustainable sourcing initiatives accordingly. Social implications - Increased consideration of distributive justice in sustainable sourcing should increase the likelihood of supplier compliance, improving conditions for employees in global textile plants. Originality/value - Extant research has studied the connection between assessment-based sustainability governance and compliance or overall performance. This paper contributes by suggesting that distributive justice might be a mediating variable helping to explain this connection.
机译:目的-本文的目的是双重的:首先,它试图确定供应商在其主要客户基于行为评估和审计组成的评估治理基础上实施可持续采购计划时是否意识到分配正义(公平)。其次,它可以洞悉特定的成本,奖励和投资,以及这些因素如何共同带来可观的公平性。设计/方法/方法-本研究采用定性研究设计。来自中国,印度和孟加拉国的纺织品制造供应商的30位高管接受了采访,以确定他们对主要客户的可持续采购计划的分配正义感。调查结果-大多数受访者认为他们的客户对治理计划的评估是不公平的。根据他们对权益方程的不同认识,可以识别出四种类型的供应商。研究的局限性/意义-研究结果将分配正义作为基于评估的治理与合规性之间的重要中介变量。他们还提供洞察力,以了解与可持续采购相关的各种类型的成本,报酬和投资,以及它们如何形成股权方程式的变体。研究结果依赖于数量有限的受访者,因此应进一步研究。实际意义-基于行为准则和审计的评估是最普遍的可持续采购治理方法,但是供应商可能会认为这是导致违规的不公正行为。因此,建议采购公司考虑供应商对成本,奖励和投资的看法,并相应地调整其可持续采购计划。社会影响-在可持续采购中越来越多地考虑分配正义,应该增加供应商合规的可能性,从而改善全球纺织工厂员工的条件。原创性/价值-现有研究已经研究了基于评估的可持续性治理与合规性或整体绩效之间的联系。本文通过提出分配正义可能是一个有助于解释这种联系的中介变量做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号