首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Organizational Analysis >Green legitimation: the construction of an environmental ethos
【24h】

Green legitimation: the construction of an environmental ethos

机译:绿色合法性:环境精神的构建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of manipulation as a legitimation strategy. Focusing on the role of verbal communication, are integrated insights from rhetorical theory with strategic and institutional approaches to legitimacy in a study of three documents published by the “most admired” companies in the USA in 2007; General Electric (GE), Toyota, and Starbucks. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on a qualitative analysis of three documents that describe the environmental focus and policies of GE, Toyota, and Starbucks. The approach involves analyzing and synthesizing a large number of environmental claims made by these companies. Findings – The analysis of the texts reveals a constructed organizational ethos that is combined with strong environmental focus to appear trustworthy in environmental matters in the eyes of consumers and stakeholders. Relying on four categories of environmental statements, the companies practice a form of “green” legitimation. Research limitations/implications – The research is limited by the small number of publications used as data sources, which makes generalizations problematic. It does not investigate the effects of the verbal claims. Originality/value – The paper adds to the literature on organizational legitimation, providing valuable insights into manipulative legitimation. It demonstrates the need to combine insights from strategic and institutional approaches to legitimacy.
机译:目的–本文的目的是研究操纵作为合法化策略的用途。 2007年美国“最受赞赏”公司发布的三份文件的研究报告中,重点关注言语交流的作用,包括从修辞理论与战略性和制度性方法对合法性的综合见解。通用电气(GE),丰田和星巴克。设计/方法/方法–该研究基于对描述GE,丰田和星巴克对环境的关注和政策的三份文件的定性分析。该方法涉及分析和综合这些公司提出的大量环境要求。调查结果–对文本的分析揭示了一种有组织的组织精神,结合了对环境的高度关注,在消费者和利益相关者的眼中对环境事务表现出值得信赖的态度。依靠四类环境声明,这些公司实行一种“绿色”合法化形式。研究的局限性/含义-研究受到用作数据源的少量出版物的限制,这使归纳成为一个难题。它不调查口头声明的影响。原创性/价值–该论文增加了有关组织合法性的文献,为操纵性合法性提供了宝贵的见解。它表明需要将战略和制度方法的见解结合到合法性上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号