首页> 外文期刊>International journal of operations & production management >Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework
【24h】

Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework

机译:作为综合供应商风险管理框架的一部分的基准化供应商开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to present and empirically support a theoretically sound, operational, and easy-to-implement supplier risk management framework that focuses on supplier development using a benchmarking approach.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The paper develops a five stage framework for supplier risk management, entailing supplier risk identification, assessment of supplier risks, reporting and decision of supplier risks, supplier risk management responses, and supplier risk performance outcomes, that builds on the conceptual approach of Ritchie and Bridley and the approach of the Association of Insurance and Risk Managers (AIRMIC). The operation of the framework is illustrated in a single case study of a UK firm.rnFindings - The paper contributes to research in operations management and particularly in risk management in the specific field of supplier risk management. The study presents details of one of the later stages of the risk framework (i.e. management responses stage) and enhances understanding of how the development of suppliers can be conducted so as to create a viable supplier base. Research limitations/implications - As an analytical method, the use of factor analysis generally requires metric scaled data, but ordinal-scaled data were applied to it. Therefore, two-factor solution with non-metric multidimensional scaling was confirmed. In addition, the operation of supplier risk framework is demonstrated within one firm only. Further case studies are therefore needed to strengthen the research findings.rnPractical implications - Managers can use the supplier risk management framework to develop firm-specific risk management programs, and to create management responses that influence and improve their relationships with suppliers. The framework is fully operational, easy to implement; and facilitates proactive supplier risk management, rather than reactive crisis management. Originality/value - The study goes beyond the conceptual discussion of supplier risk management, and demonstrates the activities a firm can undertake in response to supplier risk ratings and assessments.
机译:目的-本文的目的是提出并凭经验支持理论上合理,可操作且易于实施的供应商风险管理框架,该框架着重于使用基准化方法进行供应商开发.rn设计/方法/方法-本文拟定了五个供应商风险管理的阶段框架,该框架基于Ritchie和Bridley的概念方法以及供应商风险管理方法,包括:供应商风险识别,供应商风险评估,供应商风险报告和决策,供应商风险管理对策以及供应商风险绩效结果。保险与风险管理者协会(AIRMIC)。该框架的运作在一家英国公司的案例研究中得到了说明。rn研究结果-该论文有助于研究运营管理,尤其是供应商风险管理特定领域的风险管理。该研究提出了风险框架后期阶段(即管理响应阶段)的详细信息,并加深了对如何进行供应商发展以建立可行的供应商基础的理解。研究的局限性/含意-作为一种分析方法,因子分析的使用通常需要度量标准的数据,但对其应用了按序标准的数据。因此,确认了具有非度量多维标度的两因素解决方案。此外,供应商风险框架的运作仅在一家公司内进行。因此,需要进一步的案例研究以加强研究结果。实际意义-经理可以使用供应商风险管理框架来开发公司特定的风险管理程序,并创建影响和改善与供应商关系的管理对策。该框架全面运作,易于实施;并促进主动的供应商风险管理,而不是被动的危机管理。原创性/价值-该研究超出了供应商风险管理的概念性讨论,并演示了公司可以针对供应商风险等级和评估进行的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号