...
首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >Applications of benchmarking and classification framework for supplier risk management
【24h】

Applications of benchmarking and classification framework for supplier risk management

机译:标杆和分类框架在供应商风险管理中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a supplier risk framework. The framework provides the information about the risk level in which a supplier is classified. This study is part of the company's one- department-one-improvement policy. This policy encourages all departments to look for way to improve process management. For this study, the Purchasing Department attempts to extend its supplier management practices by integrating the risk consideration. Design/methodology/approach - This work is considered as a case study. The study integrates the benchmarking and classification concepts for this extension. The involvement from the company's purchasing department is critical. There are several steps that have been undertaken. Included are the selection of the supplies to be considered (i.e. packaging), the analysis of the formal complaints by the ratio-format indicator, the four criteria used for the classification, the risk level identification, and the next steps for improving supplier management. The results are verified by the use of cluster analysis. The data are from departmental staffs and manager. Findings - Based on the results, with the four agreed criteria (e.g. regional location, ownership type, joint venture, and registered capital and size), there are altogether four risk levels which are high, medium, low, and minimal.. For the packaging materials, most suppliers belong to the low and minimal risk levels (or 19 out of 27 suppliers). Future activities are then developed and added into the company's ISO 9001: 2008 manual. Practical implications - The suppliers' risk levels with corresponding future actions represent positive contributions to the purchasing department. Integrating supplier risk is based on the applications of benchmarking (i.e. the use of the ratio-format indicators) and classification (i.e. the need to understand the nature of the risk level) frameworks. Future actions to mitigate the risk are also proposed and incorporated into the purchasing department's procedure. Originality/value - The project underlines the roles and importance of benchmarking in strengthening the supplier management processes. It also highlights the practicality and benefits of benchmarking when linking with the classification concept for addressing today business problems.
机译:目的-本文的目的是建立供应商风险框架。该框架提供有关供应商分类风险等级的信息。这项研究是公司的“一部门一改善”政策的一部分。该政策鼓励所有部门寻找改善流程管理的方法。对于此研究,采购部试图通过整合风险考虑来扩展其供应商管理实践。设计/方法/方法-这项工作被视为案例研究。该研究集成了此扩展的基准和分类概念。公司采购部门的参与至关重要。已经采取了几个步骤。其中包括要考虑的供应品的选择(即包装),比率格式指标对正式投诉的分析,用于分类的四个标准,风险等级识别以及改善供应商管理的后续步骤。通过使用聚类分析来验证结果。数据来自部门员工和经理。调查结果-根据结果,根据四个商定的标准(例如区域位置,所有权类型,合资企业以及注册资本和规模),共有四个风险级别,分别为高,中,低和最小。包装材料方面,大多数供应商属于低风险和最低风险等级(或27个供应商中的19个)。然后,开发将来的活动并将其添加到公司的ISO 9001:2008手册中。实际意义-供应商的风险水平以及相应的未来行动表示对采购部门的积极贡献。供应商风险的综合是基于基准(即使用比率格式指标)和分类(即需要了解风险水平的性质)框架的应用。还提出了减轻风险的未来措施,并将其纳入采购部门的程序中。原创性/价值-该项目强调了基准测试在加强供应商管理过程中的作用和重要性。它还强调了在与分类概念链接以解决当今的业务问题时进行基准测试的实用性和好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号