首页> 外文期刊>International Journal Of Modelling & Simulation >Two new methods for decision-making with incomplete reciprocal fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency
【24h】

Two new methods for decision-making with incomplete reciprocal fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency

机译:基于添加剂稠度的非完全互易模糊偏好关系的两种新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we propose two new methods to solve the problem of incomplete reciprocal fuzzy preference relations. Sometimes decision-maker(s) might not be able to provide complete information about their preferences on the alternatives. In general, an incomplete preference relation can be completed if at least a set of n - 1 nonleading diagonal preference values are known and each one of the alternatives is compared directly or indirectly at least once. However, this is not always the case. Sometimes, the decision-maker(s) might not be able to provide any information with regards to at least one of the alternatives, which is called the ignorance situation. We propose two new methods based on additive consistency for solving these two problems in a multi-attributes/group decision-making environment. The first method is based on a system of equations, which is suitable for estimating missing information in the general case. The second method, which is an extension of the system of equations, utilizes a goal programming model to address the ignorance situations. Our validation of these two methods shows that the proposed methods generate a high consistency level irrespective of the nature of the problem under study. The proposed methods outperform other comparable methods without a need to modify or change the original decision-maker(s) preferences.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了两个新方法来解决不完全互惠模糊偏好关系的问题。有时决策者可能无法提供有关他们对替代方案偏好的完整信息。通常,如果已知至少一组N - 1非格丽对角线偏好值并且至少可以直接或间接比较一次,则可以完成不完全的偏好关系。然而,这并非总是如此。有时,决策者可能无法提供关于至少一个替代方案的任何信息,这些信息被称为无知情况。我们提出了两种基于添加剂一致性的新方法,以解决多个属性/组决策环境中这两个问题。第一方法基于方程式,其适用于估计常规情况中的缺失信息。第二种方法是等式系统的扩展,利用目标编程模型来解决无知情况。我们对这两种方法的验证表明,该方法不管研究下的问题的性质如何产生高一致性水平。所提出的方法优于其他类似的方法,无需修改或更改原始决策者的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号