...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of medical informatics >The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: Literature review and survey
【24h】

The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: Literature review and survey

机译:标准化数据和术语系统在计算机临床决策支持系统中的作用:文献复习和调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) should be seamlessly integrated with existing clinical information systems to enable automatic provision of advice at the time and place where decisions are made. It has been suggested that a lack of agreed data standards frequently hampers this integration. We performed a literature review to investigate whether CDSSs used standardized (i.e. coded or numerical) data and which terminological systems have been used to code data. We also investigated whether a lack of standardized data was considered an impediment for CDSS implementation. Methods: Articles reporting an evaluation of a CDSS that provided a computerized advice based on patient-specific data items were identified based on a former literature review on CDSS and on CDSS studies identified in AMIA's 'Year in Review'. Authors of these articles were contacted to check and complete the extracted data. A questionnaire among the authors of included studies was used to determine the obstacles in CDSS implementation. Results: We identified 77 articles published between 1995 and 2008. Twenty-two percent of the evaluated CDSSs used only numerical data. Fifty one percent of the CDSSs that used coded data applied an international terminology. The most frequently used international terminology were the ICD (International Classification of Diseases), used in 68% of the cases and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) in 12% of the cases. More than half of the authors experienced barriers in CDSS implementation. In most cases these barriers were related to the lack of electronically available standardized data required to invoke or activate the CDSS. Conclusion: Many CDSSs applied different terminological systems to code data. This diversity hampers the possibility of sharing and reasoning with data within different systems. The results of the survey confirm the hypothesis that data standardization is a critical success factor for CDSS development.
机译:简介:临床决策支持系统(CDSS)应该与现有临床信息系统无缝集成,以在决策的时间和地点自动提供建议。有人提出,缺乏一致同意的数据标准经常会阻碍这种集成。我们进行了文献综述,以调查CDSS是否使用了标准化(即编码或数字)数据以及已使用哪些术语系统对数据进行编码。我们还调查了缺乏标准化数据是否被视为CDSS实施的障碍。方法:基于先前对CDSS的文献综述以及在AMIA的“年度回顾”中确定的CDSS研究,确定了报告CDSS评估的文章,该文章提供了基于患者特定数据项的计算机化建议。与这些文章的作者联系以检查并完成提取的数据。纳入研究的作者之间的问卷被用来确定CDSS实施的障碍。结果:我们确定了1995年至2008年之间发表的77篇文章。22%的CDSS评估仅使用数字数据。使用编码数据的CDSS中有51%采用了国际术语。最常用的国际术语是ICD(国际疾病分类),在68%的病例中使用,而LOINC(逻辑观察标识符的名称和代码)在12%的病例中使用。超过一半的作者在CDSS实施过程中遇到了障碍。在大多数情况下,这些障碍与缺少调用或激活CDSS所需的电子可用标准化数据有关。结论:许多CDSS将不同的术语系统应用于数据编码。这种多样性阻碍了在不同系统内与数据共享和推理的可能性。调查结果证实了以下假设:数据标准化是CDSS开发的关键成功因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号