...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Material Forming >A comparison of failure prediction methods for superplastic deformation
【24h】

A comparison of failure prediction methods for superplastic deformation

机译:超塑性变形破坏预测方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a comparison between a number of different failure prediction methods for superplastic forming processes. Attention is limited here to superplastic forming of Ti-6Al-4V at 927°C. The failure prediction methods considered include the flow localisation factor approach, forming limit curves based on void growth models, such as the Rice and Tracey model and the Cocks and Ashby model, and a recently-presented superplastic forming limit diagram (SPFLD) approach. Finite element modelling of the forming process is employed to assess the failure prediction methods and the predicted results are compared with available test data.
机译:本文对超塑性成形过程的多种不同的失效预测方法进行了比较。在这里,注意力仅限于在927°C下Ti-6Al-4V的超塑性成形。考虑的失效预测方法包括流动局部化因子方法,基于空隙生长模型(例如Rice和Tracey模型以及Cocks and Ashby模型)形成极限曲线,以及最近提出的超塑性成形极限图(SPFLD)方法。成形过程的有限元建模用于评估失效预测方法,并将预测结果与可用的测试数据进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号