首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Listening >Rethinking Conceptual Approaches to the Study of “Listening”
【24h】

Rethinking Conceptual Approaches to the Study of “Listening”

机译:对“听”研究的概念方法的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Theory about listening has been strongly affected by methodological orientations and institutional pressures. It would help if researchers spent more time on the objects of study rather than method. Traditional listening research has confused listening with general cognitive abilities, such as IQ. Studying listening as memory is a tempting alternative, but carries with it its own problems. Listening should be considered as a broad field rather than a single ability or skill. Some alternatives might include listening and schemas, the relationship between listening and reading, and behaviors associated with listening.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2011.536467
机译:关于听力的理论受到方法论取向和机构压力的强烈影响。如果研究人员花更多的时间在研究对象上而不是方法上,那将会有所帮助。传统的听力研究将听力与一般的认知能力(例如智商)相混淆。将听力作为记忆来研究是一种诱人的选择,但它也有其自身的问题。听力应该被认为是广阔的领域,而不是单一的能力或技能。一些替代方案可能包括侦听和模式,侦听和阅读之间的关系以及与侦听相关的行为。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati, Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2011.536467

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号