首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovation Management >REPURPOSING PHARMACEUTICALS: DOES UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND REGULATORY POLICY ASSIGN SUFFICIENT VALUE TO NEW USE PATENTS
【24h】

REPURPOSING PHARMACEUTICALS: DOES UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND REGULATORY POLICY ASSIGN SUFFICIENT VALUE TO NEW USE PATENTS

机译:恢复药品:美国知识产权法和监管政策是否为新用途专利分配了足够的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While there are only a small number of new molecular entities (NME) and novelnbiologics annually approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administrationn(FDA) for pharmaceutical industry manufacture and distribution (Cohen,n2005; Bouley, 2008),1 there are exponentially greater numbers of improvementnpatents2 covering variations in existing pharmaceuticals (also referred to asn‘incrementally modified drugs’, or IMDs) and manufacturing processes and, innfewer cases, ‘new use’ patent applications for secondary therapeutic indicationsnthat are filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (Richardson,n2006). In the case of new use patents, major pharmaceutical companies havenemployed life-cycle total product strategies to extend pre-existing drugs into newntreatments, cures and preventions for diseases and illnesses, therefore preservingnthe market value of some successful pharmaceutical brands beyond their normaln1In 2007, the US FDA approved only 19 new drugs, 17 of them created with novel chemicalningredients, and two with biologic, gene-based ingredients (Blum, 2008). Moreover, over the previousnthree years (2005–2007), the FDA approved just 61 new molecular entities and novel biologicsnas compared to 60 FDA approvals in 1996 alone (Bouley, 2008).n2Teska (2008) describes improvement patents as inventors adding something to an existing patent;nincorporating new technology into an existing product; or finding a new use for an existing product.nTherefore, Teska (2008) includes ‘new use’ patents as a subset of an ‘improvement patent’.nInternational Journal of Innovation ManagementnVol. 16, No. 4 (August 2012) 1250016 (17 pages)n© Imperial College PressnDOI: 10.1142/S1363919611003659n1250016-1npatent life (Grau and Serbedzjia, 2005; Richardson, 2006).3 This pharmaceuticalntechnology strategy is referred to variously as ‘drug repositioning’, ‘drug re-profiling’,nor ‘drug repurposing’ (and hereafter referred to as drug repurposing).
机译:尽管每年只有极少数的新分子实体(NME)和新生物制剂被美国(US)食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于制药行业的生产和分销(Cohen,n2005; Bouley,2008),1呈指数级增长的改进专利2涵盖了现有药物(也称为“增量修饰药物”或IMD)和制造工艺中的变化,并且在更少的情况下,“第二用途”适应症的“新用途”专利申请已随美国专利和商标局(USPTO)(Richardson,n2006)。就新用途专利而言,主要制药公司已采用生命周期总产品策略,将现有药物扩展到疾病的新疗法,治愈和预防方法,因此保留了一些成功的制药品牌的市场价值,超出了正常水平1。美国FDA仅批准了19种新药,其中17种是用新的化学成分生产的,另外两种是用基于基因的生物成分生产的(Blum,2008年)。此外,在过去的三年(2005-2007年)中,FDA仅批准了61种新的分子实体和新型生物制剂,而仅在1996年就批准了60种FDA批准(Bouley,2008年)。n2Teska(2008年)描述了改进专利,因为发明人为专利申请增加了一些内容。现有专利;将新技术结合到现有产品中;因此,Teska(2008)将“新用途”专利作为“改进专利”的一部分。nInternationalJournal of Innovation Management。 16,第4号(2012年8月)1250016(17页)n©帝国学院出版社nDOI:10.1142 / S1363919611003659n1250016-1n专利生命(Grau和Serbedzjia,2005; Richardson,2006).3这种制药技术策略被不同地称为``药物重新定位'' ”,“药品重新配置文件”或“药品重新配置”(以下简称“药品重新配置”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号