首页> 外文期刊>International journal of information system modeling and design >What Practitioners Think of Inter-Organizational ERP Requirements Engineering Practices: Focus Group Results
【24h】

What Practitioners Think of Inter-Organizational ERP Requirements Engineering Practices: Focus Group Results

机译:从业者对组织间ERP需求工程实践的看法:焦点小组结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Empirical studies on requirements engineering for inter-organizational enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have demonstrated that the ERP vendor-provided prescriptive models for ERP roll-outs make tacit assumptions about the ERP adopter's context. This, in turn, leads to the implementation of suboptimal solutions. Specifically, these models assume that ERP implementations happen within a single company, and so they pay only scant attention to the stakeholders' requirements for inter-organizational coordination. Given this backdrop, the first author proposed 13 practices for engineering the ERP coordination requirements in previous publications. This paper reports a confirmatory study evaluating those practices. Using an online focus group, the authors collected and analyzed practitioners 'feedback and their experiences to understand the extent to which the proposed practices are indeed observable. The study indicated very low variability in practitioners 'perceptions regarding 12 of the 13 practices, and considerable variability in their perceptions regarding the role of modeling inter-organizational coordination requirements. The contribution of the study is twofold: (1) it adds to the body of knowledge in the sub-area of RE for ERP; and (2) it adds to the practice of using qualitative research methods in empirical RE.
机译:对组织间企业资源计划(ERP)系统的需求工程的经验研究表明,ERP供应商为ERP推出提供的说明性模型对ERP采用者的情况进行了默认。反过来,这导致实现次优解决方案。具体来说,这些模型假定ERP实施在单个公司内进行,因此它们很少关注利益相关者对组织间协调的要求。在这种背景下,第一作者在以前的出版物中提出了13种实践ERP协调要求的实践。本文报告了一项评估这些实践的验证性研究。作者使用在线焦点小组,收集并分析了从业人员的反馈意见和他们的经验,以了解所提议的实践确实可以观察到的程度。该研究表明,从业者对13种实践中的12种实践的看法的变异性非常低,并且对组织间协调需求建模的作用的看法也有显着差异。该研究的贡献是双重的:(1)它增加了ERP的RE子领域的知识体系; (2)它增加了在经验RE中使用定性研究方法的实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号