首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability
【24h】

Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability

机译:审查和评估制氢方法,以实现更好的可持续性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper examines various potential methods of hydrogen production using renewable and non-renewable sources and comparatively assesses them for environmental impact, cost, energy efficiency and exergy efficiency. The social cost of carbon concept is also included to present the relations between environmental impacts and economic factors. Some of the potential primary energy sources considered in this study are: electrical, thermal, biochemical, photonic, electro-thermal, photo-electric, and photo-biochemical. The results show that when used as the primary energy source, photonic energy based hydrogen production (e.g., photocatalysis, photoelectrochemical method, and artificial photosynthesis) is more environmentally benign than the other selected methods in terms of emissions. Thermochemical water splitting and hybrid thermochemical Cycles (e.g. Cu-Cl, S-I, and Mg-Cl) also provide environmentally attractive results. Both photoelectrochemical method and PV electrolysis are found to be least attractive when production costs and efficiencies are considered. Therefore, increasing both energy and exergy efficiencies and decreasing the costs of hydrogen production from solar based hydrogen production have a potential to bring them forefront as potential options. The energy and exergy efficiency comparisons indicate the advantages of fossil fuel reforming and biomass gasification over other methods. Overall rankings show that hybrid thermochemical cycles are primarily promising candidates to produce hydrogen in an environmentally benign and cost-effective way. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了使用可再生和不可再生资源生产氢的各种潜在方法,并比较了它们对环境的影响,成本,能效和火用效率。碳概念的社会成本也包括在内,以表示环境影响与经济因素之间的关系。本研究中考虑的一些潜在的主要能源为:电,热,生化,光子,电热,光电和光生化。结果表明,当用作主要能源时,基于光子能的氢气生产(例如光催化,光电化学方法和人工光合作用)在排放方面比其他选择的方法在环境方面更有利。热化学水分解和混合热化学循环(例如Cu-Cl,S-1和Mg-Cl)也提供了对环境有吸引力的结果。当考虑生产成本和效率时,发现光电化学方法和PV电解都没有吸引力。因此,提高能源效率和火用效率并降低太阳能制氢的制氢成本有可能使它们成为潜在的选择。能源效率和火用效率的比较表明,与其他方法相比,化石燃料重整和生物质气化具有优势。总体排名显示,混合热化学循环是最有希望以环保,低成本的方式生产氢气的候选方法。 Hydrogen Energy Publications,LLC版权所有(C)2014。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号