首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Human Rights >Engaging in Human Rights Diplomacy: The Australia-China Bilateral Dialogue Approach
【24h】

Engaging in Human Rights Diplomacy: The Australia-China Bilateral Dialogue Approach

机译:参与人权外交:中澳双边对话方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Through adopting the bilateral human rights dialogue process in 1997, Australia changed its human rights policy regarding China from public support for resolutions on China at the UN Commission on Human Rights to private annual meetings on human rights issues and a technical cooperation programme (TCP). With its aim of bringing about practical improvements in human rights through training activities for Chinese officials, the TCP has become the centrepiece of Australia's human rights policy on China. According to the spiral model of Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, support for the growth of Chinese human rights NGOs is considered necessary to encourage the Chinese government to bring about further human rights improvements. Cross-cultural dialogue is one method that may contribute to this. While TCP training activities have largely been cross-cultural exercises, these activities have mostly engaged with Chinese government officials and not Chinese human rights NGOs, limiting their support for these groups. However, the TCP's engagement with middle-level and some senior Chinese officials gives it some potential to support reformist elements within the Chinese government.
机译:通过在1997年通过双边人权对话程序,澳大利亚将其关于中国的人权政策从公众支持联合国人权委员会对中国的决议转变为关于人权问题和技术合作计划的年度私人会议。为了通过中国官员的培训活动切实改善人权,技术合作计划已成为澳大利亚对华人权政策的核心。根据托马斯·里斯(Thomas Risse),斯蒂芬·罗普(Stephen Ropp)和凯瑟琳·西金克(Kathryn Sikkink)的螺旋模型,支持中国人权非政府组织的增长被认为是必要的,以鼓励中国政府进一步改善人权。跨文化对话是可能有助于实现这一目标的一种方法。尽管技术合作计划培训活动主要是跨文化的活动,但这些活动主要与中国政府官员而非中国人权非政府组织进行接触,从而限制了他们对这些团体的支持。但是,技术合作计划与中层和一些中国高级官员的接触使其具有在中国政府内部支持改革派分子的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号