...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of forecasting >A comparative analysis of data mining methods in predicting NCAA bowl outcomes
【24h】

A comparative analysis of data mining methods in predicting NCAA bowl outcomes

机译:数据挖掘方法预测NCAA碗结果的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Predicting the outcome of a college football game is an interesting and challenging problem.Most previous studies have concentrated on ranking the bowl-eligible teams according to their perceived strengths, and using these rankings to predict the winner of a specific bowl game. In this study, using eight years of data and three popular data mining techniques (namely artificial neural networks, decision trees and support vector machines), we have developed both classification- and regression-type models in order to assess the predictive abilities of different methodologies (classification versus regression-based classification) and techniques. In the end, the results showed that the classification-type models predict the game outcomes better than regression-based classification models, and of the three classification techniques, decision trees produced the best results, with better than an 85% prediction accuracy on the 10-fold holdout sample. The sensitivity analysis on trained models revealed that the non-conference team winning percentage and average margin of victory are the two most important variables among the 28 that were used in this study.
机译:预测大学橄榄球比赛的结果是一个有趣且具有挑战性的问题,以前的大多数研究都集中在根据其感知到的实力对有资格参加碗比赛的球队进行排名,并使用这些排名来预测特定碗比赛的获胜者。在这项研究中,我们使用八年的数据和三种流行的数据挖掘技术(即人工神经网络,决策树和支持向量机),开发了分类模型和回归模型,以评估不同方法的预测能力(分类与基于回归的分类)和技术。最后,结果表明,分类类型模型比基于回归的分类模型更好地预测了游戏的结果,并且在三种分类技术中,决策树产生了最佳结果,在10个分类模型上的预测准确率均高于85%倍保留样本。对经过训练的模型的敏感性分析表明,非会议团队的获胜百分比和平均获胜率是本研究使用的28个变量中两个最重要的变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号