首页> 外文期刊>International journal of financial services management >Retailers' Entry Into The Provision Of Financial Services: The Case For And Against
【24h】

Retailers' Entry Into The Provision Of Financial Services: The Case For And Against

机译:零售商参与提供金融服务:赞成与反对的理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

With the deregulation of the financial services sector in many countries and the proliferation of different channels of distribution for financial services products, non-traditional providers have sought to enter what they perceive as this lucrative market. Retailers are amongst those non-traditional providers who have sought to enter the market for financial services, using their brand strength and ever-widening consumer proposition, to enable them to so do. This article discusses why and how leading European retailers, and in particular those based in the UK, have diversified into retailing financial services to their customers. It questions whether financial services really are a good fit with mass-market retailing and considers this case both for and against retailers diversifying into financial services. The article concludes by arguing that such diversification may leave retailers in a strategically ambiguous position, both co-operating with, whilst at the same time competing with, the traditional banks, and that this new source of competition is only likely to be successful for a limited range of financial services.
机译:随着许多国家金融服务部门的放松管制以及金融服务产品的不同分销渠道的扩散,非传统服务提供商试图进入他们认为是有利可图的市场。零售商是非传统供应商之一,他们试图利用其品牌实力和不断扩大的消费者主张进入金融服务市场,以使其能够做到这一点。本文讨论了欧洲领先零售商,尤其是总部位于英国的领先零售商为何以及如何多元化向其客户零售金融服务。它质疑金融服务是否真的适合大众市场零售,并考虑这种情况对支持和反对零售商多元化发展为金融服务的情况。本文的结论是,这种多元化可能使零售商处于战略性的歧义地位,既与传统银行合作,同时又与传统银行竞争,而这种新的竞争来源仅可能对一家传统银行成功。金融服务范围有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号