...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Content Evaluation of Traditional Core Physics Courses in Engineering Curricula
【24h】

Content Evaluation of Traditional Core Physics Courses in Engineering Curricula

机译:工程课程中传统核心物理课程的内容评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Core physics courses are prescribed in engineering curricula by professional and accrediting bodies. However, factors such as curriculum crowding and time constraints frequently bring into question the content and the extent of coverage of these courses. A survey was undertaken to assess the attitudes of engineering faculty to physics, mathematics and chemistry courses. The results for physics confirm that, while many of the classical topics in physics are perceived as relevant in engineering curricula by all faculty, topics in modem physics are not. Furthermore, variations in attitudes towards modern physics exist on a departmental and regional basis. This paper presents the results of the physics survey, with an analysis of attitudes towards physics in general in engineering curricula and to individual topics in particular, and tries to suggest reasons for the variations in departmental and regional attitudes.
机译:专业课程和认证机构在工程课程中规定了核心物理课程。但是,诸如课程拥挤和时间限制之类的因素经常使人们怀疑这些课程的内容和覆盖范围。进行了一项调查,以评估工程系教师对物理,数学和化学课程的态度。物理学的结果证实,尽管所有教授都认为物理学中的许多经典主题与工程课程相关,但现代物理学中的主题却没有。此外,在部门和地区基础上,人们对现代物理学的态度也存在差异。本文介绍了物理学调查的结果,并分析了工程课程中对物理学的总体态度,尤其是对个别主题的态度,并试图提出部门和地区态度变化的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号