首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Direct and Indirect Assessment Methods: Key Ingredients for Continuous Quality Improvement and ABET Accreditation
【24h】

Direct and Indirect Assessment Methods: Key Ingredients for Continuous Quality Improvement and ABET Accreditation

机译:直接和间接评估方法:持续质量改进和ABET认证的关键要素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The new accreditation criteria, better known as ABET EC 2000, require that each program 'must have an assessment process with documented results.' Furthermore, a white paper by the Engineering Accreditation Commission's Executive Committee states, 'The assessment process should include direct and indirect measures and does not rely only on self-report surveys and evidence that the material is 'covered' in the curriculum.' This paper presents: (a) an overview of an assessment process to make engineering programs ABET accreditation compliant: (b) assessment methods that are used to collect data, interpret them, and utilize the results to improve engineering programs: (c) a process to choose the appropriate mix of direct and indirect assessment methods! instruments, and (d) implementation of assessment methods to an electrical engineering program. As an example, the paper presents a sample of recent changes that have led to improvements based on program assessment of the University of Portland School of Engineering electrical engineering program.
机译:新的认证标准,即众所周知的ABET EC 2000,要求每个计划“必须有一个带有书面结果的评估程序”。此外,工程认证委员会执行委员会的白皮书指出:“评估过程应包括直接和间接措施,而不仅要依靠自我报告调查和证据证明课程中已“涵盖”材料。本文介绍:(a)使工程程序符合ABET认证的评估过程的概述:(b)用于收集数据,解释数据并利用结果改进工程程序的评估方法:(c)过程选择适当的直接和间接评估方法组合!工具,以及(d)实施电气工程计划的评估方法。作为示例,本文基于波特兰大学工程学院电气工程计划的计划评估,提出了导致改进的最新变化的示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号