首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Technological Innovation and Engineering Education: Beware the Da Vinci Requirement
【24h】

Technological Innovation and Engineering Education: Beware the Da Vinci Requirement

机译:技术创新与工程教育:提防达芬奇要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How best can one educate the engineer of 2020 and beyond? How can institutions meet increasing demands to produce graduates with sound scientific fundamentals and essential non-technical skills, while ensuring they are knowledgeable of state of the art advances in technology? To better frame the discussion, I present an analysis of historical technical innovation and engineering knowledge trends, and provide a perspective on the practice of parsing technological knowledge to define new engineering disciplines. Evidence suggests that the emergence of new engineering disciplines has historically matched the pace of increases in technological innovations, with both the number of disciplines and technological innovation doubling at a rate of between 31 and 35 years. Continued success of the parsing strategy requires increased emphasis on certain engineering education trends such as instilling communication and teaming skills, an emphasis on life-long learning skills, and mechanisms for interdisciplinary integration. Lastly, I recommend that a proactive and thoughtful mapping of future disciplinary demarcations could prove more beneficial than the current ad hoc process.
机译:如何最好地教育2020年及以后的工程师?机构如何满足不断增长的需求,以培养具有健全的科学基础和必要的非技术技能的毕业生,同时确保他们了解最新的技术进步?为了更好地进行讨论,我对历史技术创新和工程知识趋势进行了分析,并提供了解析技术知识以定义新工程学科的实践的观点。有证据表明,从历史上看,新的工程学科的出现与技术创新的增长步伐相吻合,学科和技术创新的数量以31至35年的速度翻了一番。解析策略的持续成功需要更多地强调某些工程学教育趋势,例如灌输交流和团队合作技能,强调终身学习技能以及跨学科整合机制。最后,我建议对未来的学科分界进行积极,深思熟虑的映射可能比当前的临时流程更有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号