【24h】

Introduction

机译:介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Online voting tools, increasingly known as voting advice (aid) or engagement applications (VAAs or VEAs), progressively have been used in numerous European countries with the objective of offering to prospective voters a matching with the candidates/parties, providing clear information regarding the party/candidate agendas and clarifying the positions of candidates/parties on a series of policy issues. Although such tools have been initially used in the Netherlands and Germany, very soon they have penetrated many other national contexts with great success. They have been deployed in different types of electoral contests, like national presidential or parliamentary elections as well as less salient elections, like the elections for the European Parliament or regional elections. Despite the claim that such tools are considered especially adapted to multiparty electoral settings rather than to two party systems (e.g. the US with its Republican/Democrat contest) (Raimonaite 2010), they can still be useful by being candidate instead of party-based.
机译:在线投票工具越来越多地被称为投票建议(aid)或参与申请(VAA或VEA),已在许多欧洲国家中逐步使用,目的是向准选民提供与候选人/政党的匹配,从而提供有关候选人/政党的清晰信息。政党/候选人议程,并就一系列政策问题阐明候选人/政党的立场。尽管此类工具最初在荷兰和德国使用,但很快它们已在许多其他国家范围内取得了巨大成功。它们被部署在不同类型的选举竞赛中,例如国家总统或议会选举以及不那么突出的选举,例如欧洲议会选举或区域选举。尽管声称此类工具被认为特别适合多党选举环境,而不适合于两党制(例如美国举行共和党/民主竞赛)(Raimonaite,2010年),但仍然可以成为候选人而不是基于党派的工具。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Communication and Internet Studies, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus;

    Centre for Research on Direct Democracy (c2d), Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA), Aarau, Switzerland;

    School of Political Sciences, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号