首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Educational Management >Prosocial behavior in the professoriate A multi-level analysis of pretenured faculty collegiality and job satisfaction
【24h】

Prosocial behavior in the professoriate A multi-level analysis of pretenured faculty collegiality and job satisfaction

机译:教授中的亲社会行为终身教师的大学合谋和工作满意度的多层次分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to focus on the relationship between college and university faculty collegiality, conceptualized as a set of prosocial behaviors, and job satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach - A multi-level structural equation model was developed to examine the relationship between faculty collegiality and job satisfaction at the individual and institutional levels, the effects of gender and race/ethnicity, the effect of institutional type (i.e. research universities vs non-research universities), and whether institutional-level perceptions of faculty collegiality and job satisfaction influence perceptions of faculty collegiality and job satisfaction at the individual level. Findings - Faculty collegiality was highly and significantly related to job satisfaction at the individual level (056) and at the institutional level (0.93). At the individual level, pretenured women faculty and faculty of color indicated significantly lower levels of collegiality. At the institutional level pretenured faculty interactions with tenured faculty colleagues were positively and significantly related to individual-level perceptions of faculty collegiality. Research limitations/implications - Study limitations include self-report data that were dependent upon accurate responses from faculty participants, and cross-sectional data. Future analyses could extend study findings by examining the influence of faculty collegiality upon such outcomes as faculty productivity and retention in future multi-level analyses. Practical implications - It is recommended that interventions be undertaken to embed prosocial behaviors into faculty research, teaching, and service activities, and to foster relationships between pretenured and tenured faculty members. Originality/value - This paper underscores the importance of collecting nationally representative faculty data and conducting rigorous multi-level analyses to inform higher education policy and practice.
机译:目的-本文的目的是关注大学和大学教师之间的合作关系,将其概念化为一系列亲社会行为和工作满意度。设计/方法/方法-建立了一个多层次的结构方程模型,以检验个人和机构层面的大学合议与工作满意度,性别和种族/民族的影响,机构类型(即研究型大学)之间的关系。与非研究型大学之间的比较),以及在机构层面上对学院的大学合谋感和工作满意度的看法是否会影响个人层面上对学院的大学合谋感和工作满意度的看法。调查结果-教师的大学与个人(056)和机构(0.93)的工作满意度密切相关。在个人层面上,受过教育的女性教职员工和有色人教员工表明大学水平明显降低。在机构层面上,终身教师与终身教师同事的互动与个人对教师合议感的认识成正相关,并与之显着相关。研究局限性/含义-研究局限性包括自我报告数据和横截面数据,这些数据取决于教师的准确反应。未来的分析可以通过检查教师合议对诸如教师生产力和在未来多层次分析中的保留率之类的结果的影响来扩展研究结果。实际意义-建议采取干预措施,将亲社会行为纳入教师的研究,教学和服务活动中,并促进终身教师和终身教师之间的关系。原创性/价值-本文强调了收集具有国家代表性的教师数据并进行严格的多层次分析以为高等教育政策和实践提供信息的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号