...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Educational Management >Identifying factor measuring collective leadership at academic workplaces
【24h】

Identifying factor measuring collective leadership at academic workplaces

机译:确定衡量学术工作场所集体领导力的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate important determinants of the culture of collective leadership in academic organizations. The present school improvement framework of Dubai School Inspection Board (DSIB) does not include cultural factors such as collective leadership, which is, according to many researchers, a leading factor of the operational efficiency and sustainable growth. The research objective was to identify the set of conditions that extend support to the development of collective leadership culture in the school work environment. In order to achieve research objectives, a sample of 271 employees from 12 underperforming private schools in Dubai was selected to examine the degree of the presence of visible practices promoting the culture of collective leadership. The past literature was explored to identify three manifest variables as determinants of the culture of collective leadership in the organization. The descriptive research design was adopted, and factor loadings on three manifest variables were examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to validate the scale, and later the model hypotheses were tested using the linear regression model. The study has revealed that shared vision, employee's commitment to achieving the organizational goal, and collaboration are key determinants, whereas staff commitment is the most important determinant of collective leadership. Generalization of the findings is one of the main concerns due to small sample size, which can be improved in future similar studies by running the model on the larger sample size. Indeed, this study is one of the few that provides a quantitative approach to the measurement of collective leadership in schools, and its findings can be a source of guideline for institutions in higher education and non-academic organizations as well. Design/methodology/approach - The descriptive research design was adopted to explain the the characteristics of the population with respect to variables used in the model. The underlying variables were explored through the past literature; therefore, EFA was also undertaken to validate the relationship between scale items and manifest independent variables of the hypothesized construct. The testing of hypothesis makes this research "confirmatory" that allows making inference about the parameters of the multiple regression models in this empirical model. Findings - The concept of collective leadership is explaining the wider role of leadership function in an organization. It is one of the cultural aspects that can be seen through everyday practices in any educational institution. These practices include shared vision among employees, commitment to achieving the common goal, and collaboration and teamwork. The results show that staff commitment is the most important determinant of collective leadership. The understanding of a cultural aspect of collective leadership is necessary to deal with the problems of nonperforming educational organizations. It is important that school leaders must think beyond the current DSIB model and include elements of collective leadership in their strategic plans. This will enable them to achieve sustainable students and organizational achievements. Employees' clarity on the objectives, trust and collaboration are prerequisite of such culture. Research limitations/implications - Generalization is one of the main concerns in this study. The larger sample size can help overcome this problem. The sample size in the current study was also gathered without stratification of the population. Schools can be classified with respect to gender, ethnicity, curriculum and social status. These factors were controlled in this study but can produce different results if included for the analysis. Data collection can be expanded to the entire country, Middle East and Asian region for further generalized interpretation. This will also open the scope to the cross-cultural analysis on the subject. Moreover, the mediating or moderating role of many other variables needs to be involved in the model for more accurate findings, such as curriculum, economic status of students, employees nationality and qualification, leadership experience and school budgetary volume are considered important factors which may affect school performance. A similar study can be conducted for the entire country covering all states. Practical implications - The culture of collective leadership is not a sole cultural factor that creates success for the institution. When an organization achieves maturity in the collective leadership, employees set up goals in their own work in alignment to the overall organizational objectives. These goals will act as challenges, and with the motivated employees will take up these challenges and find new and improved ways to address the problems. This will provoke the creative thinking among employees. They will start realizing the importance of the critical knowledge in the work. Ultimately, when the organization develops a system to identify, store and make use of such knowledge, it will become learning organization, which is ready to meet future challenges. Social implications - This study will help organizations in other sector and industry as well, especially in service industry including financial institutions, higher education, etc. This will also provide guidelines to the education ministries across the region and beyond. Originality/value - This is a new contribution in the field of HRM or workplace practices. It describes the factors determining the culture of collective leadership that in return creates success for the organization. This paper was never published before.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查学术组织中集体领导文化的重要决定因素。迪拜学校检查委员会(DSIB)当前的学校改进框架并未包括集体领导等文化因素,据许多研究人员称,集体领导是运营效率和可持续增长的主要因素。研究目的是确定在学校工作环境中扩展支持集体领导文化发展的条件。为了实现研究目标,我们从迪拜12所表现不佳的私立学校中抽取了271名员工作为样本,以研究促进集体领导文化的可见实践的程度。探索过去的文献来确定三个明显的变量,这些变量是组织中集体领导文化的决定因素。采用描述性研究设计,并通过探索性因子分析(EFA)检验了三个清单变量上的因子负荷以验证量表,随后使用线性回归模型检验了模型假设。研究表明,共同的愿景,员工对实现组织目标的承诺以及协作是关键因素,而员工的承诺是集体领导的最重要因素。由于样本量小,发现的普遍性是主要关注的问题之一,通过在较大样本量上运行模型,可以在以后的类似研究中加以改进。确实,这项研究是提供定量方法来衡量学校集体领导力的少数研究之一,其发现也可以为高等教育机构和非学术组织提供指导方针。设计/方法/方法-采用描述性研究设计来说明模型中使用的变量的总体特征。在过去的文献中探讨了潜在的变量。因此,也进行了EFA验证规模项目与假设构造的明显独立变量之间的关系。假设检验使该研究“证实”,从而可以推断该经验模型中的多元回归模型的参数。调查结果-集体领导的概念正在解释领导功能在组织中的更广泛的作用。在任何教育机构中,这都是可以通过日常实践看到的文化方面之一。这些实践包括员工之间的共同愿景,实现共同目标的承诺以及协作和团队合作。结果表明,员工的投入是集体领导的最重要决定因素。要解决表现欠佳的教育组织的问题,必须了解集体领导的文化方面。重要的是,学校领导者必须超越当前的DSIB模型思考,并在其战略计划中纳入集体领导的要素。这将使他们获得可持续的学生和组织成就。员工对目标的清晰,信任和协作是这种文化的前提。研究的局限性/意义-泛化是本研究的主要关注点之一。较大的样本量可以帮助克服此问题。当前研究中的样本量也是在没有分层的情况下收集的。可以根据性别,种族,课程和社会地位对学校进行分类。这些因素在本研究中得到了控制,但如果包括在分析中,则可能产生不同的结果。数据收集可以扩展到整个国家,中东和亚洲地区,以进行更广泛的解释。这也将为该主题的跨文化分析打开范围。此外,为了获得更准确的发现,模型中还需要涉及许多其他变量的中介或调节作用,例如课程,学生的经济状况,员工的国籍和资格,领导经验和学校预算额等,可能会影响这些重要因素。学校表现。可以对覆盖所有州的整个国家进行类似的研究。实际意义-集体领导的文化不是为机构创造成功的唯一文化因素。当组织在集体领导中达到成熟时,员工会在自己的工作中设定目标,以与组织的总体目标保持一致。这些目标将成为挑战,并且有上进心的员工将迎接这些挑战,并找到解决问题的改进的新方法。这将激发员工的创新思维。他们将开始意识到工作中关键知识的重要性。最终,当组织开发出一种识别,存储和利用这些知识的系统时,它将成为学习型组织,准备应对未来的挑战。社会影响-这项研究还将帮助其他部门和行业的组织,尤其是服务行业,包括金融机构,高等教育等。这还将为该地区及其他地区的教育部门提供指导。原创性/价值-这是人力资源管理或工作场所实践领域的新贡献。它描述了决定集体领导文化的因素,这些因素反过来为组织创造成功。该论文从未发表过。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号