...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal on E-learning >A Comparison of Evaluation Practices Based on e-Learning and Mobile Learning Delivery Rates
【24h】

A Comparison of Evaluation Practices Based on e-Learning and Mobile Learning Delivery Rates

机译:基于电子学习和移动学习交付率的评估实践的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Learning and performance professionals are increasingly pressed to measure the results of their learning program design efforts, and ultimately prove their worth. However, evaluation efforts are often limited to measuring participant reaction. This study sought to quantify evaluation practices in organizations and investigate how the use of technology-delivered instruction compared to more frequent, or robust, evaluation practices. Findings indicate that reaction evaluation remains the most frequently occurring evaluation practice. Increased amounts of evaluation for purposes of measuring learning, application and return on investment were recorded, relative to earlier studies. Results suggest that more robust evaluation is occurring in organizations that employ greater amounts of technology-delivered instruction-especially mobile learning, relative to organizations with lower levels of the same. This study has implications for e-learning and mobile learning designers, as they pursue the use of metrics to inform their efforts and establish the worth of their practice.
机译:学习和绩效专业人士越来越需要衡量他们的学习计划设计工作的结果,并最终证明自己的价值。但是,评估工作通常仅限于评估参与者的反应。这项研究试图量化组织中的评估实践,并调查与更频繁或更可靠的评估实践相比,技术交付的教学的使用情况。结果表明,反应评估仍然是最频繁发生的评估实践。与早期的研究相比,记录了用于衡量学习,应用和投资回报的评估数量的增加。结果表明,相对于组织水平较低的组织,采用大量技术交付的指令(尤其是移动学习)的组织正在进行更有效的评估。这项研究对电子学习和移动学习设计师具有意义,因为他们追求使用指标来指导他们的工作并确定其实践的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号