At King Agramant's camp: Old debates, new constitutional times

摘要

In addition to the image of constitutionalism, as a narrative of continuation with the past, the profile of which has been boosted in recent literature, with other converging and parallel factors, as a reaction to "fragmentation, deformalisation and empire," it may be-to conclude-worthwhile recalling Koskenniemi's insight as to "how the force and the apparent novelty of today's fragmentation has obscured the degree to which it captures a classical international law problem." Indeed, according to Koskenniemi, the question "How is law between sovereign states possible?" is not too different from the question "How is law between multiple regimes possible?"