首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-Communist Europe: 'Lands in-between' democracy and authoritarianism
【24h】

A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-Communist Europe: 'Lands in-between' democracy and authoritarianism

机译:后共产主义欧洲的宪政民主危机:民主与威权主义之间的“土地之间”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Just ten years after their triumphant "return to Europe" in 2004, Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are facing a very serious crisis of constitutional democracy. This crisis-which coincides with the Eurozone crisis-has a specific origin. This article will show that the rule-of-law institutions in these countries are less robust than in Western countries. In other words, Western democracies can cope more successfully with various attacks on their liberal institutions because their courts, media, human rights organizations, and ombudsmen have a longer and better-developed tradition of independence and professionalism. Conversely, where such institutions are weak and underdeveloped, as is the case in CEE, there is always the potential danger of a drift towards authoritarianism and "illiberal democracy." As examples from Hungary and Slovenia show, even the most advanced CEE democracies are not immune to this backsliding. In a relatively short period of time, both countries regressed from consolidated democracies into two distinct forms of semi-authoritarian and diminished democratic regimes. Particular worrying is the ease with which this regression occurred.
机译:中欧和东欧(CEE)国家在2004年成功取得“重返欧洲”的十年后,正面临着非常严重的宪政民主危机。这场危机-与欧元区危机同时发生-具有特定的起源。本文将表明,这些国家的法治机构不如西方国家强大。换句话说,西方民主国家可以更成功地应对对其自由主义制度的各种攻击,因为它们的法院,媒体,人权组织和监察员具有更长的,更好的独立性和专业性传统。相反,在这类机构薄弱和不发达的地方(如中欧和东欧),总有向威权主义和“自由民主”过渡的潜在危险。匈牙利和斯洛文尼亚的例子表明,即使是最先进的中东欧民主国家也无法幸免。在较短的时间内,两个国家都从巩固的民主国家退回到了两种不同形式的半专制和民主政体减少。尤其令人担忧的是这种回归发生的难易程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号