首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of aviation psychology >Selection of Air Force Pilot Candidates: A Case Study on the Predictive Accuracy of Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, and Four Neural Network Types
【24h】

Selection of Air Force Pilot Candidates: A Case Study on the Predictive Accuracy of Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, and Four Neural Network Types

机译:空军飞行员候选人的选择:判别分析,逻辑回归和四种神经网络类型的预测准确性的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We evaluated the predictive classification accuracy of discriminant analysis, logistic regression and four neural network typologies (multiple layer perceptrons, radial basis networks, probabilistic neural networks, and linear neural networks) on a flight screening program with a pass-fail criterion using several psychometric tests as predictors. A stepwise (for logistic regression and discriminant analysis) and sensitivity (for neural networks) selection procedure identified spatial visualization, eye-hand-foot coordination, and concentration capacity as significant predictors. Performance on the first few flights of the screening program was also retained as a significant predictor of final score. Regarding the accuracy of predictions, logistic regression showed the highest accuracy (77%), with high sensitivity (92%) but low specificity (31%). Discriminant analysis had high sensitivity (77%) and high specificity (64%). However, it had the second lowest accuracy (74%). The best performing neural network type was the multiple layer perception, which showed high sensitivity (85%), the second highest specificity (47%), and high accuracy (76%). Radial basis networks and probabilistic networks both fail to predict correctly the candidates who fail on the flight screening program (0% specificity).
机译:我们使用几种心理测验,通过了不合格标准的飞行筛查程序,评估了判别分析,逻辑回归和四种神经网络类型(多层感知器,径向基网络,概率神经网络和线性神经网络)的预测分类准确性。作为预测指标。逐步(用于逻辑回归和判别分析)和敏感性(用于神经网络)选择程序将空间可视化,眼-手-脚协调和集中能力确定为重要的预测指标。筛选程序的前几次飞行中的表现也被保留为最终得分的重要预测指标。关于预测的准确性,逻辑回归显示最高的准确性(77%),高的敏感性(92%)但特异性低(31%)。判别分析具有高灵敏度(77%)和高特异性(64%)。但是,它的准确率仅次于第二(74%)。表现最佳的神经网络类型是多层感知,它显示出高灵敏度(85%),第二高特异性(47%)和高精度(76%)。径向基网络和概率网络均无法正确预测在飞行检查程序中失败的候选人(特异性为0%)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Psychology and Health Research Unit & Department of Psychological Sciences, ISPA-Instituto Universitario, Lisbon, Portugal,ISPA-IU, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal;

    Psychology Centre of the Portuguese Air Force & Department of Organizational Psychology, ISPA-Instituto Universitario, Lisbon, Portugal;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:45:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号