【24h】

Upfront

机译:前期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Highly rated companies were once frequently seen on the US convertible bond circuit. But that ended in 2008 when accounting authorities ruled that issuers would be required to bifurcate convertible bonds. Essentially, they said (correctly), a CB is two things - a bond and an equity option, and the costs of those components had to be reflected on the income statement and balance sheet. But they then decreed (much less sensibly) that the bond component of a CB had to be expensed as though it was straight debt - ignoring the actual coupon (or lack of one) paid. As a result, when coupons plummeted as interest rates moved to historically low levels, it made less sense for investment-grade and crossover names to issue converts. They were often paying zero in interest costs on CBs but had to account for them as if they were paying a coupon. And investment-grade issuers were more or less entirely absent from the US converts market as a result. The Financial Accounting Standards Board has now finally reversed course, reverting to the old rules at the start of this year.
机译:高度评分的公司曾经在美国敞篷债券电路中经常看到。但是,当会计当局裁定发行人员将需要进行分叉敞篷债券时,于2008年结束。基本上,他们说(正确),CB是两件事 - 债券和股权选择,这些组件的成本必须反映在损益表和资产负债表上。但是,他们被解释(更明确地),即CB的债券组成部分必须被剥夺,好像它是直债 - 忽略了支付的实际优惠券(或缺乏)。因此,当随着利率暴跌的优惠券移动到历史低水平时,它对投资级和交叉名称发出转换的少感。他们经常以CBS的利息成本支付零,但不得不考虑他们,好像他们正在支付优惠券。投资级发行人或者从美国皈依市场的全部或多或少缺席。财务会计准则委员会现已最终扭转课程,恢复今年年初的旧规则。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Financing Review》 |2021年第2375期|1-1|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号