首页> 外文期刊>International economics and economic policy >Has there been any structural convergence in the transmission of European monetary policies?
【24h】

Has there been any structural convergence in the transmission of European monetary policies?

机译:欧洲货币政策的传递过程中是否存在任何结构性趋同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper makes three contributions. First we present a technique by which the monetary transmission mechanism of Germany, France, the UK and the Eurozone can be decomposed into its component cycles, compared across economies and across time. As a result, we found that the individual data generating processes have varied over time. Second we show that Germany has now converged on the rest of Europe and not vice versa, although Germany had dominated monetary policy making in Europe for many years. Third, we show that the UK as an outsider has behaved like a peripheral EMU country, even when EMU was not in place. In other words, the transmission mechanisms of Germany and the UK were fundamentally different. Hence, when that German monetary policy dominated Europe in a way that was not in line with the rest of Europe, never mind the UK, it is no surprise that the UK eventually left the ERM (1992). The current financial crisis may enforce the trend of convergence of the transmission mechanism. But there have been signs of a divergence between core and periphery, to some extent involving the UK, so this general convergence, as opposed to tighter convergence in the core, may not last.
机译:本文做出了三点贡献。首先,我们介绍一种技术,通过该技术可以将德国,法国,英国和欧元区的货币传导机制分解成其组成周期,与各个经济体和不同时间进行比较。结果,我们发现各个数据生成过程随时间变化。其次,我们表明,尽管德国多年来一直主导着欧洲的货币政策制定,但德国现在已经将其汇聚到欧洲其他地区,反之亦然。第三,我们证明,即使没有EMU,英国作为外部人的行为也像外围EMU国家一样。换句话说,德国和英国的传播机制根本不同。因此,当德国的货币政策以与欧洲其他国家不符的方式支配欧洲时,不要介意英国,英国最终退出ERM(1992年)也就不足为奇了。当前的金融危机可能会强化传播机制的趋同趋势。但是,有迹象表明,核心与外围国家之间存在分歧,在某种程度上涉及英国,因此这种总体性的融合(而不是核心地区更加紧密的融合)可能不会持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号