...
首页> 外文期刊>Interacting with Computers >Haptic recognition of shapes at different scales: A comparison of two methods of interaction
【24h】

Haptic recognition of shapes at different scales: A comparison of two methods of interaction

机译:触觉识别不同尺度的形状:两种交互方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to design a "haptic zoom", in this fundamental study, we compare two scaling methods by focusing on the strategies adopted by subjects who are using a sensory substitution device. Method 1 consists of a reduction of the sensor size and of its displacement speed. Speed reduction is obtained by a "human" movement adjustment (hand speed reduction). Method 2 consists of a straightforward increase in the dimensions of the image. The experimental device used couples a pen on a graphics tablet with tactile sensory stimulators. These are activated when the sensor impinges on the outline of the figure on the computer screen. This virtual sensor (a square matrix composed of 16 elementary fields) moves when the pen, guided by human hand movements, moves on the graphics tablet. The results show that the recognition rate is closely dependent on the size of the figure, and that the strategies used by the subjects are more suitable for method 2 than for method 1. In fact, half of the subjects found that method 1 inhibited their movements, and the majority of them did not feel the scaling effect, whereas this was clearly felt in method 2.
机译:为了设计“触觉缩放”,在此基础研究中,我们通过关注使用感觉替代设备的受试者采用的策略,比较了两种缩放方法。方法1包括减小传感器尺寸及其位移速度。减速是通过“人”的运动调节来实现的(手减速)。方法2包括直接增加图像的尺寸。所使用的实验设备将笔在图形输入板上与触觉感觉刺激器耦合。当传感器撞击计算机屏幕上的图形轮廓时,将激活这些功能。当笔在人类手部运动的引导下移动时,此虚拟传感器(由16个基本场组成的方阵)将移动。结果表明,识别率密切依赖于图形的大小,并且与方法1相比,对象使用的策略更适合方法2。实际上,一半的对象发现方法1抑制了他们的移动。 ,并且大多数人没有感觉到缩放效果,而方法2中显然感觉到了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号