首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence and National Security >From committees of parliamentarians to parliamentary committees: comparing intelligence oversight reform in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK
【24h】

From committees of parliamentarians to parliamentary committees: comparing intelligence oversight reform in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK

机译:从议员委员会到议会委员会:比较澳大利亚,加拿大,新西兰和英国的情报监督改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some form of legislative oversight of intelligence has become the norm in most democratic states. The near universal acceptance of the need for democratic oversight does not, however, mark the end of a process of intelligence accountability. In many states following a period of establishment and then consolidation, intelligence oversight mechanisms have begun to evolve as oversight committees have sought extra powers and developed new roles. This article examines reforms in parliamentary intelligence oversight committees in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK, focusing on the form, mandate, membership, powers and resources of the committees as well as their engagement with other parliamentary actors.
机译:某种形式的智力的立法监督已成为大多数民主国家的常态。然而,近乎普遍接受民主监督的需求并没有标志着情报问责制的结束。在建立时期的许多州,然后整合,情报监督机制已经开始发展,因为监督委员会寻求额外的权力并制定新的角色。本文探讨了澳大利亚,加拿大,新西兰和英国议会情报监督委员会的改革,重点是委员会的形式,任务,会员,权力和资源以及与其他议会行为者的参与。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intelligence and National Security》 |2020年第3期|367-384|共18页
  • 作者

    Defty Andrew;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Lincoln Sch Social & Polit Sci Polit Lincoln England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号