...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property counselor >LICENSOR AND SUBLICENSEE OF EYEWEAR PATENTS WERE COLLATERAL ESTOPPED FROM ASSERTING THEIR INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS
【24h】

LICENSOR AND SUBLICENSEE OF EYEWEAR PATENTS WERE COLLATERAL ESTOPPED FROM ASSERTING THEIR INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

机译:终止了对眼镜专利的许可人和分许可人的侵权声明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The licensor and sublicensee of patents directed to clip-on eyewear were collaterally estopped from relitigating infringement of the patents against a competitor's products, based on earlier litigation between the licensor and sublicensee and a different competitor. The claims at issue in the second litigation contained the same "retaining mechanism" term that was construed in the first litigation as requiring rims, and that construction was determinative of noninfringement by the competitor in the second suit. This was true even if additional claims in the second suit contained additional terms that were not previously construed. See Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Zenni Optical LLC, 106 U.S.P.Q.2d 1488, 2013 WL 1693956 (Fed. Cir. 2013).
机译:基于许可方和分许可方与另一竞争者之间的较早诉讼,针对夹式眼镜的专利的许可方和分许可方被撤销了针对竞争对手产品的专利侵权诉讼。在第二项诉讼中,有争议的索赔包含与第一项诉讼中相同的“保留机制”一词,即要求加边框,并且该构造决定了第二项诉讼中竞争对手没有侵权。即使第二次诉讼中的其他权利要求中包含先前未解释的其他术语,也是如此。参见Aspex Eyewear,Inc.诉Zenni Optical LLC,106 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1488,2013 WL 1693956(联邦法院,2013年)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intellectual property counselor 》 |2013年第197期| 22-22| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号