首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Alternative Dispute Resolution in Technology Agreements: Negotiation Provisions and the Risk of Unintended Consequences
【24h】

Alternative Dispute Resolution in Technology Agreements: Negotiation Provisions and the Risk of Unintended Consequences

机译:技术协议中的替代性争议解决:谈判规定和意外后果的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Negotiation provisions are popular and in widespread use today. Unfortunately, there are serious questions about the enforcement and interpretation of this type of alternative dispute resolution mechanism. The lack of clear guidance in many jurisdictions makes it difficult to resolve those questions. For this reason, it may be best to avoid the use of negotiation provisions. Certainly it is reasonable to conclude that (1) negotiation provisions should not be necessary to compel negotiations when the parties are willing to negotiate and (2) as provided by the court in Central Contracting, negotiations "would be a futile exercise" when the parties are not willing to negotiate.
机译:谈判规定今天很流行并且广泛使用。不幸的是,关于这种替代性争议解决机制的执行和解释存在严重问题。许多司法管辖区缺乏明确的指导,难以解决这些问题。因此,最好避免使用谈判条款。可以肯定地得出以下结论:(1)当当事方愿意进行谈判时,没有必要强制进行谈判;(2)按照《中央承包法》法院的规定,当当事方“谈判将是徒劳的”不愿意谈判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号