首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >The First Amendment: Apparent Immunity from Trademark Infringement?
【24h】

The First Amendment: Apparent Immunity from Trademark Infringement?

机译:第一项修正案:商标侵权是否具有明显的豁免权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When a creator of an expressive work1 incorporates a well-known trademark into the work, what recourse should the trademark owner have for infringement of its mark, if any? At the intersection of trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and the First Amendment, it is likely that the trademark owner's property interest will yield to free expression. However, due to the U.S. Supreme Court's silence on this issue, it is far from clear under what circumstances such use of a trademark in an expressive work and in that work's marketing and promotion should be permissible.
机译:当富有表现力的作品的创作者1将驰名商标纳入作品中时,商标所有者应采取何种手段侵犯其商标(如果有)?在《兰纳姆法》和《第一修正案》对商标侵权的交叉处,商标所有者的财产权益很可能会产生自由表达。但是,由于美国最高法院在此问题上保持沉默,因此尚不清楚在什么情况下可以在表情作品中以及在该作品的市场营销和促销中使用商标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号